feat(feeds): regenerate for the activity selector feed_groups scope - #344
Merged
Conversation
Adds FeedGroupScope and the feed_groups property on ActivitySelectorConfig and ActivitySelectorConfigResponse, so QA tests can send the field through the typed client instead of casting the selector to any. Also sweeps up spec drift accumulated since 0.8.4: TranslateMessageResponse replaces MessageActionResponse on translateMessage, and channel member operations gain custom_set / custom_unset. Generated with ./generate-openapi.sh against GetStream/chat feature/feeds-1853-feed-group-scope (PR #16483). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
szuperaz
approved these changes
Sep 2, 2026
Main's #345 (bounded tag vocabulary) regenerated the same generated files as this branch, colliding in src/gen/models/index.ts. Resolved by regenerating the SDK from the chat branch that has master merged in, so the spec carried both changes, rather than hand-editing generated output. Net diff vs main is the 16 feed_groups lines only: ActivityProcessingConfig and its allowed_tags/blocked_tags fields are intact, and no unrelated spec drift came along. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
JimmyPettersson85
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 7, 2026 09:40
JimmyPettersson85
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2026
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [0.8.6](v0.8.5...v0.8.6) (2026-09-07) ### Features * **feeds:** regenerate for the activity selector feed_groups scope ([#344](#344)) ([02fbab6](02fbab6)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
Regenerated for GetStream/chat#16483 (FEEDS-1853), which adds an optional
feed_groupsscope toActivitySelectorConfig:{ "type": "popular", "feed_groups": { "exclude": ["drafts"] } }Without this the chat repo's QA tests have to cast the selector to
anyto send the field. The branch name matches the chat branch, so the chat CI QA job picks it up automatically.What changed
Generated with
./generate-openapi.sh— no hand edits.The feeds change:
FeedGroupScopeinterface (include?/exclude?)feed_groups?: FeedGroupScopeonActivitySelectorConfigandActivitySelectorConfigResponseSpec drift swept up since 0.8.4 (not from that PR, but a regeneration takes the whole spec):
translateMessagenow returnsTranslateMessageResponseinstead ofMessageActionResponse— this is the one to look at, since it changes an existing method's return typecustom_set/custom_unsetCommonApiadditionNotes
Draft until the chat PR merges —
feed_groupsis not on the API until then, so releasing this first would ship a field the backend rejects.🤖 Generated with Claude Code