What it really costs
-Drupal's license is free. The cost is Drupal hosting, developers or an agency, and ongoing maintenance. Content.One is quote-based with hosting included.
-diff --git a/webengine/views/drupal-vs-content-one.html b/webengine/views/drupal-vs-content-one.html index 428b65e..80f01c3 100644 --- a/webengine/views/drupal-vs-content-one.html +++ b/webengine/views/drupal-vs-content-one.html @@ -80,46 +80,6 @@
The four trade-offs that show up most often when teams compare Drupal vs Content.One.
-Drupal's license is free. The cost is Drupal hosting, developers or an agency, and ongoing maintenance. Content.One is quote-based with hosting included.
-With Drupal, you (or a host like Acquia or Pantheon) run the servers, apply security patches, and handle upgrades. Content.One is managed, with no servers to patch.
-Drupal multisite is native but a self-managed, shared-codebase model. Content.One runs federated multisite from one platform, managed for you.
-Pick Drupal for open-source control when you have the developers to run it. Pick Content.One for managed federated multisite a marketing team can drive.
-The four trade-offs that show up most often when teams compare Drupal vs Content.One.
+Drupal's license is free. The cost is Drupal hosting, developers or an agency, and ongoing maintenance. Content.One is quote-based with hosting included.
+With Drupal, you (or a host like Acquia or Pantheon) run the servers, apply security patches, and handle upgrades. Content.One is managed, with no servers to patch.
+Drupal multisite is native but a self-managed, shared-codebase model. Content.One runs federated multisite from one platform, managed for you.
+Pick Drupal for open-source control when you have the developers to run it. Pick Content.One for managed federated multisite a marketing team can drive.
+The four trade-offs that show up most often when teams compare Sanity vs Content.One.
-Sanity is built for developer-led product teams who want full control of the content model in code. Content.One is built for marketing-led teams running many sites without a developer in the loop for every change.
-Sanity is the content backend and Content Lake only. You build and host your own frontend. Content.One includes hosting and global CDN delivery.
-Sanity meters seats, documents, and API requests, and gates SSO, custom roles, and audit logs to Enterprise. Content.One keeps SSO, custom roles, and audit logs in the standard product.
-Pick Sanity for code-first builds where engineers own the stack. Pick Content.One for federated multisite setups that marketers run day to day.
-The four trade-offs that show up most often when teams compare Sanity vs Content.One.
+Sanity is built for developer-led product teams who want full control of the content model in code. Content.One is built for marketing-led teams running many sites without a developer in the loop for every change.
+Sanity is the content backend and Content Lake only. You build and host your own frontend. Content.One includes hosting and global CDN delivery.
+Sanity meters seats, documents, and API requests, and gates SSO, custom roles, and audit logs to Enterprise. Content.One keeps SSO, custom roles, and audit logs in the standard product.
+Pick Sanity for code-first builds where engineers own the stack. Pick Content.One for federated multisite setups that marketers run day to day.
+