docs(ledger): record the merge outcome for PR #2573

[BigSimmo]

Summary

• Add the immutable prlanded review record for PR docs: full repository audit 2026-09-02 (audit only, nothing acted on) #2573 (the 2026-09-02 full repository audit), written by npm run ledger:append — never by hand. It records that the PR squash-merged to main as dfa863e57, that the branch tip's content diff against the squash commit is empty (nothing orphaned by the auto-merge race), and the CI evidence on the merged head.
• Regenerate data/repo-awareness-snapshot.json, which the new record forces (its review-record list gains one entry).

Two files. No code, migration, script, workflow, gate, test, ledger table or inbox request is changed. Nothing under src/, supabase/, worker/, scripts/ or .github/ is touched.

RAG impact: none — no RAG surface is touched.

Verification

• npm run check:branch-review-ledger — Branch review ledger guard passed: 880 live table records + 1206 archived + 589 immutable …
• npm run check:repo-awareness-snapshot — [repo-awareness] in step with data/repo-awareness-snapshot.json (197 pages, 587 documents, 2675 reviews)
• npx prettier --check on both changed files — All matched files use Prettier code style!
• npm run verify:pr-local — running locally at publication (the snapshot path routes this two-file PR to the heavy plan: lint, typecheck, full unit suite, build); the closing summary line is added to this body when it completes.

Verification not run: npm run verify:ui — no UI, routing, styling or browser behaviour changed.
Verification not run: npm run verify:release — no release or handoff confidence is claimed.
Verification not run: npm run check:production-readiness and every eval:* — provider-backed; nothing here changes clinical workflow, privacy, environment, Supabase, source governance or deployment behaviour.

No provider-backed gate was run and nothing touching OpenAI, Supabase, Railway, Sentry or live CI was executed.

Risk and rollout

• Risk: low — one new review record and its generated snapshot.
• Rollback: revert the single commit; the snapshot regenerates from the tree.
• Provider or production effects: None.
• RAG impact: none.

Clinical Governance Preflight

Classified clinical-risk only because data/repo-awareness-snapshot.json regenerates; that regeneration is the mechanical output of the committed generator. Each item is confirmed against the two-file diff.

• Source-backed claims still require linked source verification before clinical use — no answer-path, source-rendering or citation code is touched.
• No patient-identifiable document workflow was introduced or expanded without explicit governance approval — no workflow code is touched.
• Supabase target remains Clinical KB Database (sjrfecxgysukkwxsowpy) — no Supabase env value, migration or configured target changes.
• Service-role keys and private document access remain server-only — no src/ change.
• Demo/synthetic content remains clearly separated from real clinical sources — untouched.
• Source metadata, review status, and outdated/unknown-source behavior remain conservative — untouched.
• Deployment classification/TGA SaMD impact was checked when clinical decision-support behavior changed — no clinical decision-support behaviour changed.

Notes

• Delivered on a fresh branch rather than the audit branch because the repository's permission rules block force pushes, and the audit branch's remote history was already squash-merged.
• Housekeeping only; merge whenever convenient.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01FSPY4VSqg7WVukCvmHQP9t

---

Generated by Claude Code

---

Note

Low Risk
Documentation and generated repo-metadata only; no runtime, auth, or data-path changes.

Overview
Adds an immutable prlanded branch-review record for PR #2573 (2026-09-02 full repository audit), documenting the squash merge to dfa863e57, empty branch-tip vs squash diff, and green CI on the merged head.

Regenerates data/repo-awareness-snapshot.json so captured_revision points at that merge and the embedded review history picks up the new ledger row (plus other recent prlanded entries already on the branch timeline in the generator output).

Also adds a separate immutable record for PR #2576 drift repair (snapshot-only merge conflict resolved by re-running the snapshot generator). No application code, workflows, or clinical/RAG surfaces change.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit dbaac82. Configure here.}

[coderabbitai]

Important

• 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Team

Run ID: 973aee96-d6ad-4ea6-a119-6ec07f5de4df

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[supabase]

This pull request has been ignored for the connected project sjrfecxgysukkwxsowpy because there are no changes detected in supabase directory. You can change this behaviour in Project Integrations Settings ↗︎.

---

Preview Branches by Supabase.
Learn more about Supabase Branching ↗︎.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-03T00:13:49.100166Z	609bb83	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[cursor]

Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reached

Bugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit.

A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard.

(requestId: serverGenReqId_09a81c59-6d42-4edd-8978-42f0be81946f)

[cursor]

Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reached

Bugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit.

A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard.

(requestId: serverGenReqId_ea765cd3-4523-4983-820f-b09b613a72a5)

[cursor]

Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reached

Bugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit.

A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard.

(requestId: serverGenReqId_3c069326-af3a-4e3e-912e-300e42f7e5ee)