Skip to content

ci(workflows): promote go-ci run toggles to main - #20

Merged
scttbnsn merged 15 commits into
mainfrom
dev/repository-standards
Aug 16, 2026
Merged

ci(workflows): promote go-ci run toggles to main#20
scttbnsn merged 15 commits into
mainfrom
dev/repository-standards

Conversation

@scttbnsn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Promotes dev/repository-standards to main.

Carries #19: run-test / run-lint boolean inputs on go-ci.yml (default true, zero behavior change for callers pinned at the current frozen SHA). Consumers adopt by pinning a new frozen SHA deliberately.

Fixes: #18

Adds organization-wide community health defaults, validation, ownership, contribution guidance, security policy, and hardened workflow checks.
* ci(workflows): add reusable CI foundation

* fix(workflows): harden reusable release contracts
* feat(quality): add normalized reporting foundation

* test(quality): run reporting contracts in standards validation

* fix(quality): align report validator with schema

* test(quality): verify GitHub integration outputs
* ci(profile): make asset generation read-only

* fix(profile): restrict asset validation egress
* ci(review): add deduplicated Greptile summon

* fix(review): serialize exact-head Greptile summons

* test(review): lock Greptile security controls
go-ci.yml's test and lint jobs ran unconditionally, so a Go-less repo
that only wants the language-agnostic workflow-security (zizmor) job
couldn't call it. Add run-test/run-lint boolean inputs, mirroring the
existing run-govulncheck/run-workflow-security/etc. toggle pattern,
defaulting to true so existing callers see no behavior change.

Fixes: #18
@scttbnsn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@scttbnsn, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 55 minutes

Limit details: You’ve used all 1 included review currently available under your plan.

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: f829cdcc-656f-46b3-bafa-322cf2cf2e10

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 01bf40b and f347593.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/tests/reusable_ci_contract_test.py
  • .github/workflows/go-ci.yml

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
⚠️ Action not completed

Review rate limited.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@biggest-littlest biggest-littlest left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Promotion carries exactly #19 plus the ancestry reconcile; tree diff vs main is the toggles change only.

@ALARGECOMPANY ALARGECOMPANY left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Checks green, defaults preserve behavior for pinned callers.

@scttbnsn
scttbnsn merged commit 47820bd into main Aug 16, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

go-ci.yml: allow disabling the unconditional test/lint jobs (or split workflow-security out)

3 participants