Skip to content

pass through date param in callendofday #118

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
jprgrant merged 1 commit into from
Aug 6, 2026
Merged

pass through date param in callendofday #118

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions di/pubsub/pubsub.q
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -75,10 +75,10 @@ closesub:{[h]
.z.pc:{closesub[x]};

/ broadcast to all subscribers upon end of day, client needs to define endofday function
callendofday:{(neg getallhandles[])@\:`endofday`};
callendofday:{[d](neg getallhandles[])@\:(`endofday;d)};

/ broadcast to all subscribers upon end of period, client needs to define endofperiod function
callendofperiod:{(neg getallhandles[])@\:`endofperiod`};
callendofperiod:{(neg getallhandles[])@\:(`endofperiod;x)};

@ascottDI ascottDI Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the previous function we defined the variable, whereas, for this one we used the implicit. Would it be better to use the same format for both?


Comment thread
jprgrant marked this conversation as resolved.
/ get table schema
extractschema:{[table]0#value table};
Expand Down