Issue 1168 ekm integration - #1316
Merged
Merged
Conversation
# Conflicts: # FlowCrypt/src/androidTest/java/com/flowcrypt/email/ui/activity/enterprise/AddNewAccountActivityEnterpriseTest.kt # FlowCrypt/src/androidTest/java/com/flowcrypt/email/ui/activity/enterprise/SignInActivityEnterpriseTest.kt # FlowCrypt/src/main/java/com/flowcrypt/email/api/retrofit/response/api/DomainRulesResponse.kt # FlowCrypt/src/main/java/com/flowcrypt/email/api/retrofit/response/model/DomainRules.kt # FlowCrypt/src/main/java/com/flowcrypt/email/database/entity/AccountEntity.kt # FlowCrypt/src/main/java/com/flowcrypt/email/jetpack/viewmodel/PrivateKeysViewModel.kt # FlowCrypt/src/main/java/com/flowcrypt/email/jetpack/viewmodel/SubmitPubKeyViewModel.kt # FlowCrypt/src/main/java/com/flowcrypt/email/ui/activity/fragment/MainSettingsFragment.kt # FlowCrypt/src/main/java/com/flowcrypt/email/ui/activity/fragment/MainSignInFragment.kt
…nSignInFragment.| #1168
# Conflicts: # FlowCrypt/src/main/res/values/strings.xml
# Conflicts: # FlowCrypt/src/main/java/com/flowcrypt/email/ui/activity/ChangePassPhraseActivity.kt # FlowCrypt/src/main/res/values/strings.xml
tomholub
reviewed
Jun 30, 2021
Collaborator
Author
|
By the way, why I often make draft PRs? It helps me to see added changes and review them before ready |
Collaborator
Don't worry, I understand it's a draft and that it's early work. I'm just giving early feedback :-) |
tomholub
reviewed
Jul 1, 2021
tomholub
reviewed
Jul 2, 2021
Collaborator
|
Otherwise, once tests are adjusted, this looks good. Thanks! |
tomholub
reviewed
Jul 2, 2021
tomholub
left a comment
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
How about tests - is there any test targeting the setup with EKM scenario?
Collaborator
Author
Not yet. I'm working on fixing the broken tests |
Collaborator
|
got it -it was not marked as a draft, so it confused me
…On Friday, July 2, 2021, Den ***@***.***> wrote:
How about tests - is there any test targeting the setup with EKM scenario?
Not yet. I'm working on fixing the broken tests
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1316 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQDZEO3NMNIU2ACYOJPBZLTVXDV7ANCNFSM47RYYD3Q>
.
--
--
Tom James Holub <http://holub.me/>
|
DenBond7
marked this pull request as draft
July 2, 2021 15:41
IvanPizhenko
reviewed
Jul 3, 2021
IvanPizhenko
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
reviewed recent changes, no additional comments.
seisvelas
suggested changes
Jul 6, 2021
DenBond7
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 6, 2021 12:52
IvanPizhenko
approved these changes
Jul 7, 2021
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR added ekm integration
close #1168 // if this PR closes an issue
Tests (delete all except exactly one):
To be filled by reviewers
I have reviewed that this PR... (tick whichever items you personally focused on during this review):