Skip to content

Revert Portable/MPLAB Formatting - #883

Merged
aggarg merged 7 commits into
FreeRTOS:mainfrom
Skptak:fixMPLabFormatting
Nov 23, 2023
Merged

Revert Portable/MPLAB Formatting#883
aggarg merged 7 commits into
FreeRTOS:mainfrom
Skptak:fixMPLabFormatting

Conversation

@Skptak

@Skptak Skptak commented Nov 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Revert PR #768 on MPLAB ports

Test Steps

Checklist:

  • I have tested my changes. No regression in existing tests.
  • I have modified and/or added unit-tests to cover the code changes in this Pull Request.

Related Issue

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@Skptak
Skptak requested a review from a team as a code owner November 8, 2023 23:06
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Nov 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (2dfc514) 93.67% compared to head (b2f6975) 93.67%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #883   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.67%   93.67%           
=======================================
  Files           6        6           
  Lines        3177     3177           
  Branches      884      884           
=======================================
  Hits         2976     2976           
  Misses         94       94           
  Partials      107      107           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 93.67% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Skptak Skptak mentioned this pull request Nov 8, 2023
2 tasks

@chinglee-iot chinglee-iot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Compared with commit before #768
d6bccb1 | 2023-09-05 | Gaurav-Aggarwal-AWS | Fix heap address calculation issue (#781)

d6bccb1...Skptak:FreeRTOS-Kernel:fixMPLabFormatting

  • portable/MPLAB/PIC18F/port.c :
    Fix typo in later commit.
  • portable/MPLAB/PIC18F/portmacro.h
    Fix typo in later commit.
  • portable/MPLAB/PIC24_dsPIC/portmacro.h
    Fix typo in later commit.
  • portable/MPLAB/PIC32MEC14xx/portmacro.h
    Add more trace macros in later commit
  • portable/MPLAB/PIC32MX/port.c
    Fix typo in later commit
  • portable/MPLAB/PIC32MX/portmacro.h
    Add more trace macros in later commit
  • portable/MPLAB/PIC32MZ/port.c
    Fix typo in later commit
  • portable/MPLAB/PIC32MZ/portmacro.h
    Add more trace macro in later commit

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@aggarg
aggarg merged commit 8d1da77 into FreeRTOS:main Nov 23, 2023
@Skptak
Skptak deleted the fixMPLabFormatting branch December 19, 2023 13:07
laroche pushed a commit to laroche/FreeRTOS-Kernel that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2024
* Expand RV32E demo support, prevent 'ebreak' looping

The RegTest tests are modified in the Qemu and HiFive demos
to support RV32E and its limited set of registers.

'ebreak' call looping is removed in RegTest. This produces
a lot of noise when debugging.

* Correct whitespace

* Remove 'ebreak' instruction calls

The ebreak instruction sets and exception
which leads to jumping around the binary. This
can make debugging difficult.

* Fix whitespace formatting
DajanaV pushed a commit to auroralabs-loci/FreeRTOS-Kernel that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2025
* Revert the formatting PR

* Fix spelling mistakes

---------

Co-authored-by: Rahul Kar <118818625+kar-rahul-aws@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Gaurav-Aggarwal-AWS <33462878+aggarg@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants