In the paper, the authors highlight that using contrastive learning can carry more precious environmental information, and the t-SNE visualization indicates the stronger representation ability of this method.
However, when I attempted to run the open-source code, the swap loss didn't drop, regardless of short or long iterations.
I am wondering if this is an expected behavior for contrastive learning algorithms, or if there might be an issue with my implementation.


In the paper, the authors highlight that using contrastive learning can carry more precious environmental information, and the t-SNE visualization indicates the stronger representation ability of this method.
However, when I attempted to run the open-source code, the swap loss didn't drop, regardless of short or long iterations.
I am wondering if this is an expected behavior for contrastive learning algorithms, or if there might be an issue with my implementation.

