If CETL is intended to resemble std, should it not use the same naming convention? One significant deviation is that it uses camelCase or PascalCase where std uses snake_case. There already are some entities that would need to be renamed, but it can be done with (deprecated) aliases to avoid API breakage.
If CETL is intended to resemble
std, should it not use the same naming convention? One significant deviation is that it uses camelCase or PascalCase where std uses snake_case. There already are some entities that would need to be renamed, but it can be done with (deprecated) aliases to avoid API breakage.