get rid of inclusion of pf17 inside of unbounded_variant

[serges147]

No description provided.

[thirtytwobits]

Can this be a public member of unbounded_variant? ub_var feels like an ugly hack.

[serges147]

ok

[pavel-kirienko]

If we're going to keep this, should we not alert the user in the doc comments for these constructors that one should consider using the freestanding factory function instead:

CETL/include/cetl/unbounded_variant.hpp

Line 1109 in 4c754a5

explicit unbounded_variant(in_place_type_t<ValueType>, Args&&... args)

CETL/include/cetl/unbounded_variant.hpp

Line 1130 in 4c754a5

explicit unbounded_variant(Pmr* const mem_res, in_place_type_t<ValueType>, Args&&... args)

CETL/include/cetl/unbounded_variant.hpp

Line 1156 in 4c754a5

explicit unbounded_variant(in_place_type_t<ValueType>, std::initializer_list<Up> list, Args&&... args)

CETL/include/cetl/unbounded_variant.hpp

Line 1180 in 4c754a5

explicit unbounded_variant(Pmr* const mem_res,

So that one does not have to touch the ad-hoc in_place_type

[serges147]

So that one does not have to touch the ad-hoc in_place_type

Good idea, I will do this.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
100.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud