-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 161
fix(stdlib): bridge node IncomingMessage body into web Request body (POST req.json()) #5683
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
proggeramlug
merged 1 commit into
main
from
fix/nextjs-post-body-incomingmessage-bridge-5437
Jun 25, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
Small-handle threshold deviates from the project convention (
0x10000vs0x100000).The guard uses
raw < 0x10000(65536), but the documented small-handle boundary isvalue < 0x100000(1048576). AnyIncomingMessagehandle id allocated in the[0x10000, 0x100000)range is skipped here and falls through to ToString, reproducing the original"[object Object]"regression for those ids. Note this also straddles thebits >= 0x10000heap-pointer boundary used inbody_value_buffer_bytes(Line 141), so the two thresholds should be reconciled deliberately.🔧 Align with the documented handle threshold
As per coding guidelines: "Detect small pointer handles using the comparison
value < 0x100000to distinguish between handles and other NaN-boxed values".📝 Committable suggestion
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Source: Coding guidelines