You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
PAS Agent Teams builds apps (PO/BA/Dev/QA loop) — but flow-level test automation must NOT be written by the dev team that builds the feature ("the dev team doesn't grade its own homework"). We want a dedicated agent with a QA mindset, delivered the PAGS way: an agent as a product, with its own UI page that has nothing to do with the development console.
The developer experience: open the QA agent's page, point it at your app, and watch tests run live in the browser — no local installs, no repo changes, ever.
What the agent does
Explores the app like a tester — reads the app's live UI (and optionally its knowledge base), identifies the user journeys that matter (sign in, core actions, error paths), and proposes a flow list. QA mindset: edge cases, wrong inputs, empty states — not happy-path-only.
Runs them and watches results: triggers in-browser runs (embedded observable runner) and headless platform runs; on failures, produces a human-readable diagnosis (which step, screenshot, likely cause).
Maintains them: after app deploys, re-runs, notices selector drift/broken flows, and repairs specs — filing findings the owner can forward to the dev side (one-way integration; the QA agent never edits app code).
The UI (a separate page, not a dev tool)
A PAGS agent instance page (standard agent board pattern):
App picker (owner's PAS apps) → flow list with pass/fail status and last-run times
"Watch" mode: embeds the PAS observable runner — the app in an iframe, steps executing visibly, step list with live pass/fail
Run history + failure screenshots; a chat panel to instruct the agent ("cover the puzzle wrong-attempt cap", "why did flow 3 fail?")
Zero code shown by default — this is a QA surface, not an IDE
Motivation
PAS Agent Teams builds apps (PO/BA/Dev/QA loop) — but flow-level test automation must NOT be written by the dev team that builds the feature ("the dev team doesn't grade its own homework"). We want a dedicated agent with a QA mindset, delivered the PAGS way: an agent as a product, with its own UI page that has nothing to do with the development console.
The developer experience: open the QA agent's page, point it at your app, and watch tests run live in the browser — no local installs, no repo changes, ever.
What the agent does
The UI (a separate page, not a dev tool)
A PAGS agent instance page (standard agent board pattern):
Dependencies / integration
Acceptance criteria
🤖 Generated with Claude Code