You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Why don't loop messages have timestamps? What are they designed to portray? Why are they a
different colour?
The colour is deliberate and defensible. The missing timestamp is a gap, and it matters most for
exactly these messages.
What they are
Loop entries — **Loop → engine** (step 3): …, **Loop complete** — are role: "system", the
same channel as Error: …, "No response", and interrupted-turn notices. They exist because the
platform, not the browser, drives autonomous work (InstanceDetail.tsx:369):
The console used to BE the loop: poll /loop-decide, send the next instruction. That died with
the tab and could not be budgeted, because the platform did not drive it. Now the workflow drives
and this only reports.
So they are the audit trail of work that ran whether or not anyone was watching. That is why they
belong in the thread rather than a log.
Why the colour differs — this part is right
:1082: yellow, centre-aligned, pill for short entries and a bordered block for long ones. Three
distinct channels:
you
accent, right
assistant
panel, left
system
yellow, centre
Centre + yellow reads as "neither of you said this — the platform is reporting". Worth keeping.
Why there is no timestamp
The time is rendered inside a header row that exists for two roles only:
There is no system branch, so no header, so no time — even though createdAt is on the record and formatDateTime is already imported.
Why that is backwards for loop entries specifically
A user or assistant message is bounded by the ones around it; you roughly know when you said it. A
loop entry reports work that ran on its own schedule, minutes apart, often while you were
elsewhere. In a real FWS thread, **Loop → engine** (step 3) and (step 4) were 2m20s apart
and nothing on screen said so.
The two facts a reader actually wants from an autonomous run are when and how long between
steps, and the transcript currently shows neither.
For loop entries, show elapsed since the previous entry as well. "step 3 → step 4: 2m20s" is
the scanning signal; an absolute clock time is not.
Keep it visually quiet — these are centred pills, not bubbles with headers. A right-aligned text-[0.65rem] opacity-70 inside the pill is probably enough; a full header row would fight the
shape.
Verification
A system message shows its time; a loop entry also shows the gap since the previous one.
The report
The colour is deliberate and defensible. The missing timestamp is a gap, and it matters most for
exactly these messages.
What they are
Loop entries —
**Loop → engine** (step 3): …,**Loop complete**— arerole: "system", thesame channel as
Error: …, "No response", and interrupted-turn notices. They exist because theplatform, not the browser, drives autonomous work (
InstanceDetail.tsx:369):So they are the audit trail of work that ran whether or not anyone was watching. That is why they
belong in the thread rather than a log.
Why the colour differs — this part is right
:1082: yellow, centre-aligned, pill for short entries and a bordered block for long ones. Threedistinct channels:
Centre + yellow reads as "neither of you said this — the platform is reporting". Worth keeping.
Why there is no timestamp
The time is rendered inside a header row that exists for two roles only:
There is no system branch, so no header, so no time — even though
createdAtis on the record andformatDateTimeis already imported.Why that is backwards for loop entries specifically
A user or assistant message is bounded by the ones around it; you roughly know when you said it. A
loop entry reports work that ran on its own schedule, minutes apart, often while you were
elsewhere. In a real FWS thread,
**Loop → engine** (step 3)and(step 4)were 2m20s apartand nothing on screen said so.
The two facts a reader actually wants from an autonomous run are when and how long between
steps, and the transcript currently shows neither.
Proposal
createdAton system messages, in the user's timezone (Agents report timestamps in UTC because nothing ever told them the user's timezone — and no prompt has a clock #329 — right now the only timesvisible anywhere are the UTC strings the agent puts in prose).
the scanning signal; an absolute clock time is not.
text-[0.65rem] opacity-70inside the pill is probably enough; a full header row would fight theshape.
Verification