Skip to content

[WIP] Fix CI by applying NX workspace formatter - #2092

Closed
RemiBonnet with Copilot wants to merge 1 commit into
stagingfrom
copilot/fix-nx-format
Closed

[WIP] Fix CI by applying NX workspace formatter#2092
RemiBonnet with Copilot wants to merge 1 commit into
stagingfrom
copilot/fix-nx-format

Conversation

Copilot AI commented Oct 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for asking me to work on this. I will get started on it and keep this PR's description up to date as I form a plan and make progress.

Original prompt

The repository's Pull Request workflow is failing on CI due to formatting issues reported by npx nx format:check. The user requested an automated fix by applying the NX workspace formatter so that npx nx format:check passes.

Task: create a branch, run the NX formatter, commit the formatted files, and open a pull request that fixes formatting only.

Detailed actionable steps for the coding agent:

  1. Create a new branch named fix/nx-format from the repository default branch.
  2. Run the workspace formatter: npx nx format:write (or npx nx format:all if required by the workspace) at the repository root. Ensure the command runs with the project toolchain available via npx so Volta/pnpm is not required for formatting.
  3. Stage and commit all changes produced by the formatter. Use commit message: chore: apply nx formatting (npx nx format:write).
  4. Push the branch fix/nx-format to the repository.
  5. Open a pull request against the repository's default branch with the title: chore: apply nx formatting to satisfy npx nx format:check.
  6. In the PR description reference the failing CI job and commit sha from the job logs: ref a7ef3b6 and the workflow file .github/workflows/pull-request.yml. State that this PR only contains formatting changes to make npx nx format:check pass.

Notes:

  • Do not introduce any functional changes.
  • If the formatter does not change any files, include a short PR message explaining no changes were necessary and that npx nx format:check should be re-run in CI.
  • If additional files need minor adjustments to satisfy the formatter, include only those.

This pull request was created as a result of the following prompt from Copilot chat.

The repository's Pull Request workflow is failing on CI due to formatting issues reported by npx nx format:check. The user requested an automated fix by applying the NX workspace formatter so that npx nx format:check passes.

Task: create a branch, run the NX formatter, commit the formatted files, and open a pull request that fixes formatting only.

Detailed actionable steps for the coding agent:

  1. Create a new branch named fix/nx-format from the repository default branch.
  2. Run the workspace formatter: npx nx format:write (or npx nx format:all if required by the workspace) at the repository root. Ensure the command runs with the project toolchain available via npx so Volta/pnpm is not required for formatting.
  3. Stage and commit all changes produced by the formatter. Use commit message: chore: apply nx formatting (npx nx format:write).
  4. Push the branch fix/nx-format to the repository.
  5. Open a pull request against the repository's default branch with the title: chore: apply nx formatting to satisfy npx nx format:check.
  6. In the PR description reference the failing CI job and commit sha from the job logs: ref a7ef3b6 and the workflow file .github/workflows/pull-request.yml. State that this PR only contains formatting changes to make npx nx format:check pass.

Notes:

  • Do not introduce any functional changes.
  • If the formatter does not change any files, include a short PR message explaining no changes were necessary and that npx nx format:check should be re-run in CI.
  • If additional files need minor adjustments to satisfy the formatter, include only those.

✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

@qovery-github-app

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Qovery Preview

Qovery can create a Preview Environment for this PR.
To trigger its creation, please post a comment with one of the following command.

Command Blueprint environment
/qovery preview eb065558-e399-4727-82d8-86472b003c4f Test
/qovery preview 4e787d9b-196e-49ca-8597-6a1b00338f5c Dev test
/qovery preview cc1de7de-94e5-40f8-8e45-bc8986d9dfec storybook
/qovery preview 28c47145-c8e7-4b9d-8d9e-c65c95b48425 staging
/qovery preview {all|UUID1,UUID2,...} To preview multiple environments

This comment has been generated from Qovery AI 🤖.
Below, a word from its wisdom :

There are two hard problems in computer science: naming things, cache invalidation and off-by-1 errors

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants