gains default AGENTS.md#7
Conversation
|
@jdhoffa Does this actually affect RMI's copilot instances? |
As I understand it:
Based on Copilot's documentation, Copilot will look for an So I believe it should get recognized yeah? |
|
At least that's what I understand, but I could be wrong :-) |
mbarlow12
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My only hesitation here is that the content here fits in line with user-level settings (i.e. ~/.codex/AGENTS.md or ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md). Both Codex and Claude Code (CC) have ways to quickly generate the project-level context files.
- Codex appears to do it automatically
- CC has
/init
Especially if we're mainly leveraging this in CI/CD right now, there's not much guidance for reviewing PRs or other specifics to check.
I'll follow up with draft "Review Guidance" section in a comment.
@jdhoffa Does this actually affect RMI's copilot instances?
As I understand it:
- This
AGENTS.mdwill act as a fallback in any repository that doesn't already have a file sitting at.github/AGENTS.md- So in case a repository doesn't have any
AGENTS.md, this one would appear- If a repository does already have a
.github/AGENTS.mdthen that would take precedenceBased on Copilot's documentation, Copilot will look for an
AGENTS.mdanywhere in the repo (including under.github.So I believe it should get recognized yeah?
@jdhoffa do you know if GH Copilot has a similar project < user pattern where both RMI/.github/AGENTS.md and <project repo>/AGENTS.md are loaded into context? That would be excellent and IMO fit better with the content here.
Ah maybe I miscommunicated this, Copilot does not ever look at Does that make sense? So, to answer your question, yes I believe if a project had both a project specific |
andre-scheinwald
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems reasonable. I haven't looked into using an agents.md file so I have no strong opinion. As long as it doesn't break the things :)
Pulled verbatim from https://github.com/RMI/stitch/blob/main/AGENTS.md