Missing Q from second quoting example

[habere-et-dispertire]

Line 28 is missing Q at the start .

I added say and semicolons so that the entire example runs -- but feel free to omit that if you think it makes it clearer .

I'm unfamiliar with the :skip-test but I imagine we can omit that then too ?

🍓

[coke]

The Q isn't necessary there, is it? (this example is highlighting the quotes, not the Q)

[coke]

I'm unfamiliar with the :skip-test but I imagine we can omit that then too ?

Yes, if the code compiles cleanly, remove the skip-test attribute - this will cause the tests to rerun and you can see the result in the CI

[habere-et-dispertire]

Aside: I think rakupp is pulling examples from documentation marked as passing for its tests. This then happens to help with that effort as the suggestion makes it self-contained.

[raiph]

@habere-et-dispertire

To elaborate on @coke's comment about the "Missing Q"...

As I understand it, one is supposed to be allowed to omit the Q prefix in the specific case that the opening delimiter character is ｢.

Indeed, Rakudo supports that case -- one can write say ｢More plainly.｣ and it works in the glot.io Rakudo and has as far back as I remember, more than a decade if I recall correctly. (So while it's entirely possible no one has ever used it in code they care about, it's also possible they have.)

[coke]

@raiph - deprecating features in rakudo has nothing to do with the doc ticket and adding this here complicates our ability to resolve this documentation pull request.

[raiph]

@coke

Point taken. Sorry about that. Comment edited to remove that aspect (and indeed the notion of even mentioning it given that what it's doing is ultimately reasonable anyway). So, FWIW, from my perspective this PR is good to go.