Skip to content

[docs] charter: link the accepted BiDi support boundary record - #17928

Merged
AutomatedTester merged 1 commit into
trunkfrom
charter-link-17670
Aug 19, 2026
Merged

AutomatedTester merged 1 commit into
trunkfrom
charter-link-17670

Conversation

@AutomatedTester

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

🔗 Related Issues

Follow-up to #17670 (accepted 2026-07-23) and the Selenium 5 charter, #17717.

💥 What does this PR do?

Links the accepted BiDi support boundary record from the Selenium 5 charter.

docs/plans/selenium-5.md still marked that decision _ADR pending_, but
docs/decisions/17670-bidi-implementation-boundaries.md is on trunk with Status: Accepted.
The charter's own rule (line 16-18) says a decision is marked ADR pending "until its record is
accepted, at which point this charter is updated to link it" — so this is that update.

The other three required decisions (network async/event API, script and logging async/event API,
Selenium Manager released API) stay _ADR pending_; their records are still open.

🔧 Implementation Notes

Relative link to the record rather than to the PR, matching how the charter refers to in-repo
documents and so it keeps working for anyone reading the tree offline.

🤖 AI assistance

  • AI assisted (complete below)
    • Tool(s): Claude Code
    • What was generated: the one-line documentation edit and this description
    • I reviewed all AI output and can explain the change

💡 Additional Considerations

Bookkeeping only — no behavior change. The charter will need the same edit for each remaining
record as it is accepted.

🔄 Types of changes

  • Cleanup (formatting, renaming)

17670 was accepted on 2026-07-23; the charter states each decision is
marked ADR pending until its record is accepted, at which point the
charter links it.
@AutomatedTester
AutomatedTester merged commit 4091580 into trunk Aug 19, 2026
28 checks passed
@AutomatedTester
AutomatedTester deleted the charter-link-17670 branch August 19, 2026 11:39
This was referenced Aug 28, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant