Skip to content

License unclear #77

Description

@dylancvdean

The base model is described in README.md as being licensed under CC BY-SA-4.0, but the description of the license instead matches CC BY-4.0, which is linked in 2/3 links in that section. The licensing section should either include the requirement under CC BY-SA-4.0 to release modified versions of the base model and to link to the correct license, or should be changed to the CC BY-4.0 license that more closely matches the description. Otherwise, the license is ambiguous.

Activity

  1. mcmonkey4eva commented on May 24, 2023

    @mcmonkey4eva

    The base model is licensed as CC BY-SA-4.0

    The "SA" part, "Share-Alike", is a requirement (ie, you may not redistribute a derivative of StableLM that does not follow a matching license).

  2. AndrewGodfrey commented on Jun 22, 2023

    @AndrewGodfrey

    This is not fixed yet. The description of the base model still has 2 links that go to a different license.

  3. mcmonkey4eva commented on Jun 22, 2023

    @mcmonkey4eva

    There are two licenses: CC BY-SA-4 for the Base model, and CC BY-SA-NC-4 for the Instruct tune model

  4. AndrewGodfrey commented on Jun 22, 2023

    @AndrewGodfrey

    We are talking about the description for the base model. It has 2 links to the non-SA license.

  5. dylancvdean commented on Jun 22, 2023

    @dylancvdean
    Author

    Not only that, it describes the SA obligation as only indicating if changes are made rather than distributing under the same license as well, and then that description links to the non SA license. This is very likely to confuse people unfamiliar with the CC license family, especially as this model attracts attention from hobbyists

  6. AndrewGodfrey commented on Jun 22, 2023

    @AndrewGodfrey

    Oh yes, that was very misleading as well. And even if this was clearly written, the meaning of “remix” and “redistribute” aren’t clear when applied to the inference results of a LLM.

  7. mcmonkey4eva commented on Jun 23, 2023

    @mcmonkey4eva

    Oh oh my god, I finally found what you're referring to, Under the license, you must give [credit](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/#) to Stability AI, provide a link to the license, and [indicate if changes were made](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/#). in the readme - the explanation part has links that are wrong.

    cc @jon-tow

  8. AndrewGodfrey commented on Jun 23, 2023

    @AndrewGodfrey

    Yes, now you mention it, it was probably copied from a page describing the other license, but not updated properly. As dylancvdean says, it should also mention the ShareAlike obligation (if it’s going to list obligations at all).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions