Prohibit to set static fields from library classes #697 - #699
Merged
Conversation
Damtev
previously requested changes
Aug 10, 2022
sergeypospelov
force-pushed
the
sergey/static_fields_concrete_processing
branch
2 times, most recently
from
August 11, 2022 08:41
537d0dd to
cea277b
Compare
sergeypospelov
force-pushed
the
sergey/static_fields_concrete_processing
branch
from
August 12, 2022 11:37
cea277b to
bbcb4a8
Compare
CaelmBleidd
approved these changes
Aug 12, 2022
dtim
approved these changes
Aug 12, 2022
dtim
left a comment
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree with comments by @CaelmBleidd (especially w.r.t. condition readability in isStaticFieldMeaningful), but LGTM overall.
sergeypospelov
enabled auto-merge (squash)
August 15, 2022 11:02
denis-fokin
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
meaningfulStaticFieldsinTraverser. Also these fields won't be substituted with unbounded symbolic variables.UtSettingsfor this feature.initializedStaticFieldsfield inMemory.WorkaroundReason.Fixes #697
Type of Change
How Has This Been Tested?
Manual Scenario
To reproduce section from #697 works correctly.
Checklist (remove irrelevant options):