[Docs] Clarify terminal command completion behavior - #21
Draft
zoomote[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Documented that foreground terminal commands remain attached until their final output and exit status are available, and that background execution requires an explicit tool timeout.
Why this change was made
The terminal lifecycle fix changes an important expectation for users relying on PowerShell shell integration or Inline Terminal: normal commands do not advance Zoo Code's reasoning before completion.
Impact
Users can distinguish ordinary foreground execution from the explicit timeout path that intentionally backgrounds a command.
Related PRs