proposal to add windows support to the custom target functionality

[Brookke]

No description provided.

[MarvinJWendt]

Hi @Brookke, I can't get this to run:

[Brookke]

@MarvinJWendt I have made some changes, could you also share your "experimenting" code if you don't mind and I can test my side :)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #8 (d46366e) into main (b809a13) will decrease coverage by 15.73%.
The diff coverage is 1.35%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main       #8       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   26.04%   10.30%   -15.74%     
===========================================
  Files           4        5        +1     
  Lines          96      165       +69     
===========================================
- Hits           25       17        -8     
- Misses         69      146       +77     
  Partials        2        2               

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
cursor.go	33.33% <ø> (-53.34%)	⬇️
cursor_test_linux.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
utils.go	0.00% <ø> (ø)
cursor_windows.go	27.27% <16.66%> (-0.64%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b809a13...d46366e. Read the comment docs.

[MarvinJWendt]

Hi @Brookke, the experimenting code is actually not relevant. It was a simple hello world, but the code didn't compile 😅

[Brookke]

Hi @Brookke, the experimenting code is actually not relevant. It was a simple hello world, but the code didn't compile 😅

Hopefully the code should compile now. I have done some testing on a windows vm and it seems to work. The test will fail as the underlying calls are different on windows.

[MarvinJWendt]

Hi @Brookke, sorry for the long wait. I am currently looking into fixing the tests :)

[MarvinJWendt]

LGTM! Thanks for the PR :)