testing: add new test for logLevels#4953
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4953 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 70.30% 70.54% +0.23%
==========================================
Files 29 29
Lines 1677 1677
Branches 371 371
==========================================
+ Hits 1179 1183 +4
+ Misses 424 420 -4
Partials 74 74
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
✨ Coder.com for PR #4953 deployed! It will be updated on every commit.
|
jawnsy
approved these changes
Mar 7, 2022
TinLe
pushed a commit
to TinLe/code-server
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2022
* feat: add new test for logLevels * wip * feat: add test for valid log level env var
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds a test to ensure that setting the log level with
process.env.LOG_LEVELtoerrorsets it as expected.Fixes #4916