[rlc-10/6.12.0-211.32.1.el10_2] Multiple patches tested (5 commits)#1442
Open
ciq-kernel-automation[bot] wants to merge 5 commits into
Open
Conversation
…nge_handle_ioctl() cve CVE-2026-23149 commit-author Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com> commit 12f15d5 Since GEM bo handles are u32 in the uapi and the internal implementation uses idr_alloc() which uses int ranges, passing a new handle larger than INT_MAX trivially triggers a kernel warning: idr_alloc(): ... if (WARN_ON_ONCE(start < 0)) return -EINVAL; ... Fix it by rejecting new handles above INT_MAX and at the same time make the end limit calculation more obvious by moving into int domain. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com> Reported-by: Zhi Wang <wangzhi@stu.xidian.edu.cn> Fixes: 5309672 ("drm: Add DRM prime interface to reassign GEM handle") Cc: David Francis <David.Francis@amd.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.18+ Tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260123141540.76540-1-tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com (cherry picked from commit 12f15d5) Signed-off-by: Roxana Nicolescu <rnicolescu@ciq.com>
cve CVE-2026-46215 commit-author Francis, David <David.Francis@amd.com> commit 5e28b7b There was a potential race condition in change_handle. The ioctl briefly had a single object with two idr entries; a concurrent gem_close could delete the object and remove one of the handles while leaving the other one dangling, which could subsequently be dereferenced for a use-after-free. To fix this, do the same dance that gem_close itself does. (f6cd7da drm: Release driver references to handle before making it available again) First idr_replace the old handle to NULL. Later, if the prime operations are successful, actually close it. create_tail required a similar dance to avoid a similar problem. (bd46cec drm/gem: Fix race in drm_gem_handle_create_tail()) It idr_allocs the new handle with NULL, then swaps in the correct object later to avoid races. We don't need to do that here, since the only operations that could race are drm_prime, and change_handle holds the prime lock for the entire duration. v2: cleanups of error paths Signed-off-by: David Francis <David.Francis@amd.com> Co-authored-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> Reported-by: Puttimet Thammasaeng <pwn8official@gmail.com> Tested-by: Vitaly Prosyak <Vitaly.Prosyak@amd.com> Cc: Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Christian Koenig <Christian.Koenig@amd.com> Fixes: 5309672 ("drm: Add DRM prime interface to reassign GEM handle") Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit 5e28b7b) Signed-off-by: Roxana Nicolescu <rnicolescu@ciq.com>
cve CVE-2026-52966 commit-author Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@qq.com> commit dc36660 Commit 5e28b7b introduced a logical error by failing to replace the newly generated IDR pointer to old id's pointer at the correct location within the "change handle" logic; this resulted in the issue reported by syzbot [1]. Specifically, the new IDR object pointer is intended to replace the original id's pointer during the normal execution flow. Additionally, an unnecessary conditional check for the ret exit path has been removed. [1] !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&prime_fpriv->dmabufs) WARNING: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c:224 at drm_prime_destroy_file_private+0x48/0x60 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c:224, CPU#0: syz.0.17/5833 Call Trace: drm_file_free.part.0+0x7e6/0xcc0 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c:269 drm_file_free drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c:237 [inline] drm_close_helper.isra.0+0x186/0x200 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c:290 drm_release+0x1ab/0x360 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c:438 Fixes: 5e28b7b ("drm: Set old handle to NULL before prime swap in change_handle") Reported-by: syzbot+d7c9eed171647e421013@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d7c9eed171647e421013 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Tested-by: syzbot+d7c9eed171647e421013@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@qq.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/tencent_C267296443AAA4567771176886DFF364A305@qq.com (cherry picked from commit dc36660) Signed-off-by: Roxana Nicolescu <rnicolescu@ciq.com>
cve-bf CVE-2026-46215 commit-author Zhenghang Xiao <kipreyyy@gmail.com> commit 7164d78 drm_gem_change_handle_ioctl leaves the old handle live in the IDR during the window between spin_unlock(table_lock) and the final spin_lock(table_lock). A concurrent drm_gem_handle_delete on the old handle succeeds in this window, decrements handle_count to 0, and frees the GEM object while the new handle's IDR entry still references it. NULL the old handle's IDR entry before dropping table_lock so that any concurrent GEM_CLOSE on the old handle sees NULL and returns -EINVAL. Restore the old entry on the prime-bookkeeping error path. Fixes: 5e28b7b ("drm: Set old handle to NULL before prime swap in change_handle") Signed-off-by: Zhenghang Xiao <kipreyyy@gmail.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260526085313.26791-1-kipreyyy@gmail.com (cherry picked from commit 7164d78) Signed-off-by: Roxana Nicolescu <rnicolescu@ciq.com>
cve CVE-2026-53145 commit-author Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch> commit 1a4f03d [airlied: just added some comments on how to reenable] On-list because the cat is out of the bag and we're clearly not good enough to figure this out in private. The story thus far: 5e28b7b ("drm: Set old handle to NULL before prime swap in change_handle") tried to fix a race condition between the gem_close and gem_change_handle ioctls, but got a few things wrong: - There's a confusion with the local variable handle, which is actually the new handle, and so the two-stage trick was actually applied to the wrong idr slot. 7164d78 ("drm/gem: fix race between change_handle and handle_delete") tried to fix that by adding yet another code block, but forgot to add the error handling. Which meant we now have two paths, both kinda wrong. - dc36660 ("drm: Replace old pointer to new idr") tried to apply another fix, but inconsistently, again because of the handle confusion - this would be the right fix (kinda, somewhat, it's a mess) if we'd do the two-stage approach for the new handle. Except that wasn't the intent of the original fix. We also didn't have an igt merged for the original ioctl, which is a big no-go. This was attempted to address off-list in the original bugfix, and amd QA people claimed the bug was fixed now. Very clearly that's not the case. Here's my attempt to sort this out: - Rename the local variable to new_handle, the old aliasing with args->handle is just too dangerously confusing. - Merge the gem obj lookup with the two-stage idr_replace so that we avoid getting ourselves confused there. - This means we don't have a surplus temporary reference anymore, only an inherited from the idr. A concurrent gem_close on the new_handle could steal that. Fix that with the same two-stage approach create_tail uses. This is a bit overkill as documented in the comment, but I also don't trust my ability to understand this all correctly, so go with the established pattern we have from other ioctls instead for maximum paranoia. - Adjust error paths. I've tried to make the error and success paths common, because they are identical except for which handle is removed and on which we call idr_replace to (re)install the object again. But that made things messier to read, so I've left it at the more verbose version, which unfortunately hides the symmetry in the entire code flow a bit. - While at it, also replace the 7 space indent with 1 tab. And finally, because I flat out don't trust my abilities here at all anymore: - Disable the ioctl until we have the igt situation and everything else sorted out on-list and with full consensus. v2: Sashiko noticed that I didn't handle the error path for idr_replace correctly, it must be checked with IS_ERR_OR_NULL like in gem_handle_delete. So yeah, definitely should just the existing paths 1:1 because this is endless amounts of tricky. Also add the Fixes: line for the original ioctl, I forgot that too. Reported-by: DARKNAVY (@DarkNavyOrg) <vr@darknavy.com> Signed-off-by: Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch> Fixes: dc36660 ("drm: Replace old pointer to new idr") Cc: syzbot+d7c9eed171647e421013@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@qq.com> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> Fixes: 5e28b7b ("drm: Set old handle to NULL before prime swap in change_handle") Cc: David Francis <David.Francis@amd.com> Cc: Puttimet Thammasaeng <pwn8official@gmail.com> Cc: Christian Koenig <Christian.Koenig@amd.com> Fixes: 7164d78 ("drm/gem: fix race between change_handle and handle_delete") Cc: Zhenghang Xiao <kipreyyy@gmail.com> Fixes: 5e28b7b ("drm: Set old handle to NULL before prime swap in change_handle") Reviewed-by: David Francis <David.Francis@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260604194437.1725314-1-simona.vetter@ffwll.ch (cherry picked from commit 1a4f03d) Signed-off-by: Roxana Nicolescu <rnicolescu@ciq.com>
kemotaha
approved these changes
Jul 15, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR has been automatically created after successful completion of all CI stages.
Commit Message(s)
Test Results
✅ Build Stage
✅ Boot Verification
✅ Kernel Selftests
✅ LTP Results
🤖 This PR was automatically generated by GitHub Actions
Run ID: 29338907098