Skip to content

chore: add default code owners - #7649

Merged
PastaPastaPasta merged 1 commit into
dashpay:developfrom
PastaPastaPasta:t3code/add-codeowners-reviewers
Aug 29, 2026
Merged

chore: add default code owners#7649
PastaPastaPasta merged 1 commit into
dashpay:developfrom
PastaPastaPasta:t3code/add-codeowners-reviewers

Conversation

@PastaPastaPasta

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

Pull requests currently do not automatically request review from the core maintainers responsible for repository-wide changes.

What was done?

Added a repository-wide CODEOWNERS rule that assigns the three default code owners to every changed path.

How Has This Been Tested?

Validated the file and patch with git diff --check. No runtime tests are needed for this GitHub metadata-only change.

Breaking Changes

None.

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

This pull request was created by Codex.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-08-29T13:12:32.687392Z f4d80b4 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@thepastaclaw

thepastaclaw commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🕓 Ready for review — 4 ahead in queue (commit f4d80b4)
Queue position: 5/7
ETA: start ~14:27 UTC · complete ~14:44 UTC (median 17m across 30 recent reviews; 3 slots)
Queued 57m ago · Last checked: 2026-08-29 14:10 UTC

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 17a0ba3f-b4ed-43c9-96d9-1e62b9932930

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4876cab and f4d80b4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 4 included reviews per hour; 3 remain after this review.


Walkthrough

Added a repository-wide .github/CODEOWNERS entry. The entry assigns ownership to @UdjinM6, @knst, and @PastaPastaPasta.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to f4d80

This change adds default reviewers for all repository paths without affecting runtime behavior, data, permissions, or deployment; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks and review.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description check ✅ Passed The description explains the repository-wide CODEOWNERS change and its purpose. It matches the changeset.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the main change: adding default repository-wide code owners.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@PastaPastaPasta
PastaPastaPasta merged commit d11736d into dashpay:develop Aug 29, 2026
40 of 41 checks passed
@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 added this to the 24 milestone Sep 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants