Workflow Health — 2026-05-31
Executive read: All 5 outcomes show healthy acceptance (100%), with 2 items still in flight in PR Sous Chef. Small sample size (3 runs) limits signal confidence; 1 item evaluated with weak evidence only. Trend is improving vs. previous day (+12.5pp acceptance).
Legend:
- Status: 🟩 accepted · 🟨 pending · ⬜ unknown
- Lifecycle health: 🟢 resolving · 🟡 in flight · ⚪ underdefined
- References: one linked item per status emoji, in the same order as the Status column
�� Action Items
-
Monitor 2 pending items in PR Sous Chef — Two comments created 41 minutes ago show no follow-up yet. These are young and likely just pending initial review. No immediate action needed, but flag if they remain unaddressed after 48 hours.
-
Daily Sentrux Report needs evaluation criteria — The created discussion was evaluated as "unknown" due to lacking clear acceptance/rejection signals. Define what constitutes success for this workflow (engagement threshold, resolution time, etc.).
-
Verify weak evidence item — 1 of 5 items (20%) was evaluated using only existence check (Daily Sentrux Report). This is near the threshold for quality concern; watch for this pattern in future runs.
-
Small sample size — Only 3 runs checked and 5 total outcomes evaluated. This is a good day but lacks the statistical weight of prior reports (which had 16-40 outcomes). Continue monitoring for patterns as data accumulates.
Detailed metrics, evidence quality, workflow counts, and trends
Outcome Scorecard — 2026-05-31
| Metric |
Value |
Status |
| Acceptance rate |
100.0% |
🟢 >80% |
| Zero-touch rate |
0.0% |
🔴 <25% |
| Waste rate |
0.0% |
🟢 <10% |
| Median time to resolution |
— |
— |
| Accepted |
2 / 5 |
— |
| — strong evidence |
0 |
merged, completed, approved |
| — medium evidence |
2 |
engaged, retained |
| — weak evidence |
0 |
existence only |
| Rejected |
0 |
— |
| Ignored |
0 |
no observable follow-up |
| Unknown |
1 |
— |
| Zero-touch |
0 / 2 |
— |
| Pending |
2 |
— |
| Runs checked |
3 |
— |
Per-Workflow Breakdown
| Workflow |
Accepted |
Rejected |
Ignored |
Unknown |
Pending |
Acceptance |
Zero-touch |
| PR Sous Chef |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
33% |
0% |
| Daily Model Inventory Checker |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100% |
0% |
| Daily Sentrux Report |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0% |
0% |
Evidence Quality
⚠️ 1 item was evaluated using only a generic existence check (signal: target_exists_only). This contributes to unknown outcomes and may understate acceptance. Dedicated evaluators for create_discussion should define success criteria.
Trend Signal
⬆️ Improving
- Acceptance rate: 100.0% (was 87.5% on 2026-05-30, +12.5pp)
- Waste rate: 0.0% (was 2.5%, -2.5pp)
- Zero-touch rate: 0.0% (stable)
Note: Small sample size (5 outcomes vs. 40+ in previous runs) limits confidence in trend. Improvement may reflect natural variance rather than sustained quality change. Continue monitoring for patterns.
📊 Measured by Outcome Collector · haiku45 34.8K
Workflow Health — 2026-05-31
Executive read: All 5 outcomes show healthy acceptance (100%), with 2 items still in flight in PR Sous Chef. Small sample size (3 runs) limits signal confidence; 1 item evaluated with weak evidence only. Trend is improving vs. previous day (+12.5pp acceptance).
Legend:
�� Action Items
Monitor 2 pending items in PR Sous Chef — Two comments created 41 minutes ago show no follow-up yet. These are young and likely just pending initial review. No immediate action needed, but flag if they remain unaddressed after 48 hours.
Daily Sentrux Report needs evaluation criteria — The created discussion was evaluated as "unknown" due to lacking clear acceptance/rejection signals. Define what constitutes success for this workflow (engagement threshold, resolution time, etc.).
Verify weak evidence item — 1 of 5 items (20%) was evaluated using only existence check (Daily Sentrux Report). This is near the threshold for quality concern; watch for this pattern in future runs.
Small sample size — Only 3 runs checked and 5 total outcomes evaluated. This is a good day but lacks the statistical weight of prior reports (which had 16-40 outcomes). Continue monitoring for patterns as data accumulates.
Detailed metrics, evidence quality, workflow counts, and trends
Outcome Scorecard — 2026-05-31
Per-Workflow Breakdown
Evidence Quality
target_exists_only). This contributes tounknownoutcomes and may understate acceptance. Dedicated evaluators forcreate_discussionshould define success criteria.Trend Signal
⬆️ Improving
Note: Small sample size (5 outcomes vs. 40+ in previous runs) limits confidence in trend. Improvement may reflect natural variance rather than sustained quality change. Continue monitoring for patterns.