Summary
A recurring memory and today’s analysis both point to the same preventable failure mode: workflow markdown changes land without regenerated .lock.yml artifacts, causing lock/hash drift and downstream activation failures on main.
Memory: mem_4afaa0965161
Memory: sem_ef67ccfd978b
Rationale
The memory store repeatedly reinforces that make recompile must follow markdown workflow edits, and the open stale-lock issue (#44735) shows this is still escaping into the default branch. A lightweight CI or pre-merge guard would turn a known tribal rule into an enforceable invariant.
Next steps
- Identify the current workflow or check path that validates generated artifacts under
.github/workflows/.
- Add a check that detects markdown workflow diffs without corresponding regenerated
.lock.yml changes.
- Ensure the failure message tells contributors to run
make recompile.
- Validate by editing a sample workflow markdown file and confirming the guard fails before regeneration and passes after regeneration.
Generated by 🦛 Daily Hippo Learn · 12.4 AIC · ⌖ 14 AIC · ⊞ 5.4K · ◷
Summary
A recurring memory and today’s analysis both point to the same preventable failure mode: workflow markdown changes land without regenerated
.lock.ymlartifacts, causing lock/hash drift and downstream activation failures onmain.Memory: mem_4afaa0965161
Memory: sem_ef67ccfd978b
Rationale
The memory store repeatedly reinforces that
make recompilemust follow markdown workflow edits, and the open stale-lock issue (#44735) shows this is still escaping into the default branch. A lightweight CI or pre-merge guard would turn a known tribal rule into an enforceable invariant.Next steps
.github/workflows/..lock.ymlchanges.make recompile.