Rewrite `experiments.<name>` in engine.model to valid job-scoped expressions by Copilot · Pull Request #61599 · github/gh-aw

Copilot · 2026-09-17T12:55:55Z

${{ experiments.model }} used in engine.model (or the split top-level model: field) was rewritten for prompt-body text but not for ANTHROPIC_MODEL, GH_AW_INFO_MODEL, or GH_AW_ENGINE_MODEL. The compiled lock file kept the literal experiments.model reference, which GitHub Actions rejects at run time since experiments is not a valid context:

ANTHROPIC_MODEL: ${{ experiments.model }}   # invalid — not a GH Actions context

Fix

Added regex-based rewrite helpers (pkg/workflow/compiler_experiments.go) that convert experiments.<name> into a valid, job-scoped reference:
- RewriteExperimentsReferenceForDownstreamJobs → needs.activation.outputs.<name>, for jobs downstream of activation (agent, detection, conclusion, safe-outputs).
- RewriteExperimentsReferenceForActivationJob / RewriteActivationOutputsToLocalStepOutputs → steps.pick-experiment.outputs.<name>, for the activation job's own info step (a job cannot reference its own outputs via needs).
Applied RewriteExperimentsReferenceForDownstreamJobs to workflowData.Model right after experiments are extracted from frontmatter, so every consumer of data.Model (Claude/Codex/Copilot/Gemini/Pi engines' native model env vars, GH_AW_ENGINE_MODEL, etc.) picks up the corrected value automatically.
Applied RewriteActivationOutputsToLocalStepOutputs in generateCreateAwInfo so GH_AW_INFO_MODEL (emitted inside the activation job itself) uses the step-local form instead.
Matching is word-boundary-anchored and scoped strictly to declared experiment names, so an experiment name that is a prefix of another (e.g. model vs model_variant) can't corrupt an unrelated occurrence, and unrelated text is never rewritten.

Result

ANTHROPIC_MODEL: ${{ needs.activation.outputs.model }}      # agent job
GH_AW_INFO_MODEL: "${{ steps.pick-experiment.outputs.model }}"  # activation job
GH_AW_ENGINE_MODEL: "${{ needs.activation.outputs.model }}"     # conclusion job

Tests

Unit tests for each rewrite helper, including a name-prefix-collision regression case.
End-to-end compile tests asserting the lock file for a Claude workflow using experiments.model never contains a raw experiments.model token, for both the nested engine.model and split top-level model: forms.

Fixes Claude engine: ${{ experiments.model }} not rewritten — workflow fails to parse with 'Unrecognized named-value: experiments' #61584

Generated by 👨‍🍳 PR Sous Chef · pi · gpt54 · 28.8 AIC · ⊞ 9.6K · ◷
_{Comment /souschef to run again}

Run: https://github.com/github/gh-aw/actions/runs/35240793612

Warning

Firewall blocked 1 domain

The following domain was blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:

github.com

To allow these domains, add them to the network.allowed list in your workflow frontmatter:

network:
  allowed:
    - defaults
    - "github.com"

See Network Configuration for more information.

Generated by 👨‍🍳 PR Sous Chef · pi · gpt54 · 24.9 AIC · ⊞ 9.3K · ◷
_{Comment /souschef to run again}

…sions Co-authored-by: pelikhan <4175913+pelikhan@users.noreply.github.com>

…ed experiment names Co-authored-by: pelikhan <4175913+pelikhan@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: pelikhan <4175913+pelikhan@users.noreply.github.com>

…prefix collisions Co-authored-by: pelikhan <4175913+pelikhan@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: pelikhan <4175913+pelikhan@users.noreply.github.com>

github-actions · 2026-09-17T13:33:28Z

✅ Ponytail Reviewer completed successfully!

Warning

Firewall blocked 1 domain

The following domain was blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:

ab.chatgpt.com

To allow these domains, add them to the network.allowed list in your workflow frontmatter:

network:
  allowed:
    - defaults
    - "ab.chatgpt.com"

See Network Configuration for more information.

Generated by Ponytail Reviewer for #61599

github-actions · 2026-09-17T13:33:32Z

⚠️ Security scanning failed for Design Decision Gate 🏗️. Review the logs for details.

Warning

Firewall blocked 2 domains

The following domains were blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:

github.com
proxy.golang.org

To allow these domains, add them to the network.allowed list in your workflow frontmatter:

network:
  allowed:
    - defaults
    - "github.com"
    - "proxy.golang.org"

See Network Configuration for more information.

🏗️ ADR gate enforced by Design Decision Gate 🏗️

github-actions · 2026-09-17T13:33:37Z

⚠️ PR Code Quality Reviewer failed during code quality review.

Warning

Threat Detection Engine Failure — The analysis engine could not complete. This is a tooling failure, not a security finding.

What happened

The threat detection engine failed to produce results.

Review the workflow run logs for details.

🔎 Code quality review by PR Code Quality Reviewer

github-actions · 2026-09-17T13:33:59Z

🧠 Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer failed during the skills-based review.

🧠 Reviewed using Matt Pocock's skills by Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer

github-actions · 2026-09-17T13:34:02Z

✅ Test Quality Sentinel completed test quality analysis.

Test Quality Sentinel skipped because pre-fetch PR data was unavailable: unable to fetch test file diff

🧪 Test quality analysis by Test Quality Sentinel

github-actions

Ponytail pass focused only on simplification opportunities.

net: -6 lines possible.

Warning

Firewall blocked 1 domain

The following domain was blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:

ab.chatgpt.com

To allow these domains, add them to the network.allowed list in your workflow frontmatter:

network:
  allowed:
    - defaults
    - "ab.chatgpt.com"

See Network Configuration for more information.

Generated by ✂️ Ponytail Reviewer for #61599 · codex · gpt53codex · 5.44 AIC · ⌖ 3.28 AIC · ⊞ 12.5K
_{Comment /ponytail to run again}

Comments that could not be inline-anchored

pkg/workflow/compiler_experiments.go:69

L69: yagni: separate activation-specific rewrite helper adds API surface for one call site. Inline rewriteDeclaredExperimentNames(..., pickExperimentOutputsPrefix) at use site.

pkg/workflow/compiler_yaml_step_lifecycle.go:179

L179: shrink: temp infoModel variable only feeds one Fprintf. Call RewriteActivationOutputsToLocalStepOutputs(data.Model, data.Experiments) inline in the formatter call.

Copilot

🟡 Changes recommended

The activation info step reads experiment outputs before selection occurs, and the regex can corrupt unrelated expression text.

Get a fresh assessment by requesting another Copilot review.

Pull request overview

Fixes experiment-based model references when compiling GitHub Actions workflows.

Changes:

Adds scoped experiment-reference rewrite helpers.
Applies rewrites to model environment variables and activation metadata.
Adds unit and compilation regression tests.

File summaries

File	Description
`pkg/workflow/compiler_experiments.go`	Adds reference-rewriting helpers.
`pkg/workflow/compiler_orchestrator_workflow.go`	Rewrites configured models after experiment extraction.
`pkg/workflow/compiler_yaml_step_lifecycle.go`	Adapts model references for activation metadata.
`pkg/workflow/compiler_experiments_test.go`	Tests rewrite behavior and name collisions.
`pkg/workflow/engine_config_test.go`	Tests compiled Claude model expressions.

Review details

Files reviewed: 5/5 changed files
Comments generated: 2
Review effort level: Balanced

💡 Add a code-review agent skill for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Copilot · 2026-09-17T14:22:51Z

+		// data.Model may reference an experiment variant as needs.activation.outputs.<name>
+		// (rewritten from engine.model: ${{ experiments.<name> }} for jobs downstream of
+		// activation). This step runs inside the activation job itself, so it must read the
+		// pick-experiment step's output directly rather than via the needs context.
+		infoModel := RewriteActivationOutputsToLocalStepOutputs(data.Model, data.Experiments)


Fixed in b6eda7a: experiment selection steps are now emitted right after the setup steps (addActivationExperimentSteps in newActivationJobBuildContext), so pick-experiment runs before generate_aw_info and GH_AW_INFO_MODEL / the activation model output resolve to the selected variant. Job outputs for experiment names are still registered after the engine outputs so a declared name keeps precedence. Added an ordering assertion in TestCompileClaudeWithExperimentsModel.

Copilot · 2026-09-17T14:22:51Z

+// experimentsFieldReferenceRegex matches `experiments.<name>` tokens (simple identifier)
+// appearing anywhere inside a raw configuration string, such as an `engine.model` value.
+// Unlike experimentNameRegex/experimentComparisonRegex in expression_extraction.go, this
+// pattern is not anchored, so it can rewrite the reference wherever it appears inside a
+// larger ${{ ... }} expression (e.g. "${{ experiments.model }}").
+var experimentsFieldReferenceRegex = regexp.MustCompile(`\bexperiments\.([a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*)\b`)


Fixed in b6eda7a: rewriteDeclaredExperimentNames now only scans the bodies of ${{ ... }} expressions, skips single-quoted string literals (including doubled-quote escapes), and ignores matches adjacent to a .. So ${{ format('experiments.model-{0}', inputs.suffix) }} and ${{ fromJSON(inputs.config).experiments.model }} are left untouched, while ${{ experiments.model || 'sonnet' }} still rewrites. Covered by TestRewriteExperimentsReferenceOnlyRewritesExpressionTokens.

github-actions · 2026-09-17T13:38:29Z

🏗️ ADR Required — draft added for PR #61599

I enforced the design-decision gate for this PR because it adds 228 new lines in business-logic directories (pkg/), which exceeds the default 100-line threshold.

Evidence used

adr-prefetch-summary.json: has_implementation_label=false, default_business_additions=228, requires_adr_by_default_volume=true
PR title/body: this change fixes how engine.model / top-level model: values using ${{ experiments.model }} are compiled into job-scoped workflow expressions
Diff files: compiler rewrite helpers, orchestrator wiring, activation-job rendering, and regression tests in pkg/workflow/*

Gate result

No existing ADR covering this decision was found in the PR body or on the branch, so I added a draft ADR:

docs/adr/61599-rewrite-experiment-model-references.md

Next action

Please review and refine the draft ADR so the architectural decision and trade-offs are explicit before merge.

Warning

Firewall blocked 2 domains

The following domains were blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:

github.com
proxy.golang.org

To allow these domains, add them to the network.allowed list in your workflow frontmatter:

network:
  allowed:
    - defaults
    - "github.com"
    - "proxy.golang.org"

See Network Configuration for more information.

🏗️ ADR gate enforced by Design Decision Gate 🏗️ · pi · gpt54 · 16.9 AIC · ⊞ 9.9K · ◷
_{Comment /review to run again}

github-actions

Reviewed the experiments-model rewrite change (refactor/cleanup on gh-aw compiler internals). The logic looks correct and well-tested: RewriteExperimentsReferenceForDownstreamJobs is applied to workflowData.Model right after experiments are extracted, and RewriteActivationOutputsToLocalStepOutputs correctly converts it back for the activation job's own info step, since a job can't reference its own outputs via needs. Word-boundary anchoring in the regexes correctly avoids the model vs model_variant prefix-collision case, which is covered by a dedicated test. Compile-time model validation (validateModelAliasMap, warnCodexCopilotModelCompatibility) runs before the rewrite and already skips values containing ${{, so no regression there.

One non-blocking cleanup item left as an inline comment: RewriteExperimentsReferenceForActivationJob is new, exported, and tested, but has no production caller — the activation job's info step actually goes through the downstream-rewrite-then-local-conversion path instead. Worth removing or wiring in to avoid dead public API surface.

🧵 Reviewed using Impeccable skills by Impeccable Skills Reviewer · copilot · sonnet50 · 91.6 AIC · ⌖ 13.8 AIC · ⊞ 8.6K

github-actions · 2026-09-17T13:43:09Z

+// info" step), where the experiment variant was just selected by the earlier pick-experiment
+// step in the same job. A job cannot reference its own outputs via the `needs` context, so
+// `needs.activation.outputs.*` is not valid here.
+func RewriteExperimentsReferenceForActivationJob(s string, experiments map[string][]string) string {


RewriteExperimentsReferenceForActivationJob is exported and covered by TestRewriteExperimentsReferenceForActivationJob, but it has no production caller anywhere in the codebase — the activation job's own info step actually goes through RewriteExperimentsReferenceForDownstreamJobs (in extractAdditionalConfigurations) followed by RewriteActivationOutputsToLocalStepOutputs (in generateCreateAwInfo). If this helper isn't meant to be used directly elsewhere, consider removing it (and its test) to avoid dead public API surface, or wire it in where it was originally intended so the two forward/backward-conversion paths aren't duplicated logic. @copilot please address this.

github-actions

🧠 Reviewed using Matt Pocock's skills by Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer · copilot · sonnet50 · 220.2 AIC · ⌖ 16.4 AIC · ⊞ 10.6K
_{Comment /matt to run again}

github-actions · 2026-09-17T13:53:01Z

+// info" step), where the experiment variant was just selected by the earlier pick-experiment
+// step in the same job. A job cannot reference its own outputs via the `needs` context, so
+// `needs.activation.outputs.*` is not valid here.
+func RewriteExperimentsReferenceForActivationJob(s string, experiments map[string][]string) string {


[/codebase-design] RewriteExperimentsReferenceForActivationJob is exported but never called from production code — only RewriteExperimentsReferenceForDownstreamJobs (in compiler_orchestrator_workflow.go) and RewriteActivationOutputsToLocalStepOutputs (in compiler_yaml_step_lifecycle.go) are wired up.

💡 Why this matters

The activation job path is instead handled by rewriting downstream-form (needs.activation.outputs.*) back to step-local form via RewriteActivationOutputsToLocalStepOutputs, which works because workflowData.Model is already rewritten to downstream form earlier in extractAdditionalConfigurations. That leaves RewriteExperimentsReferenceForActivationJob as dead code with no callers outside its own unit test — it adds public API surface and a maintenance burden without being exercised by the actual compile path.

Consider either removing this function (and its dedicated test) if RewriteActivationOutputsToLocalStepOutputs fully covers the activation-job case, or documenting why both entry points need to exist (e.g. a future direct-experiments-to-activation-job path that does not go through the downstream rewrite first).

@copilot please address this.

Removed RewriteExperimentsReferenceForActivationJob (and its test) in b6eda7a — it had no production caller; the activation-job path goes through RewriteActivationOutputsToLocalStepOutputs.

gh-aw-bot · 2026-09-17T14:03:59Z

@copilot PR sous-chef triage: there are unresolved review threads to address before a maintainer can investigate quickly.

Copilot review: activation model output is read before pick-experiment runs, so the activation/job output can be empty. Please reorder the step flow or update the info/model output after experiment selection. Rewrite experiments.<name> in engine.model to valid job-scoped expressions #61599 (comment)
Copilot review: the experiment rewrite regex is too broad and can mutate quoted literals or nested property chains. Please constrain rewriting to valid expression tokens only. Rewrite experiments.<name> in engine.model to valid job-scoped expressions #61599 (comment)
Follow-up cleanup: decide whether RewriteExperimentsReferenceForActivationJob should be removed or wired into production, then run the pr-finisher skill. Rewrite experiments.<name> in engine.model to valid job-scoped expressions #61599 (comment)

Warning

Firewall blocked 1 domain

The following domain was blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:

github.com

To allow these domains, add them to the network.allowed list in your workflow frontmatter:

network:
  allowed:
    - defaults
    - "github.com"

See Network Configuration for more information.

Generated by 👨‍🍳 PR Sous Chef · pi · gpt54 · 24.6 AIC · ⊞ 9.6K · ◷
_{Comment /souschef to run again}

…okens Co-authored-by: gh-aw-bot <259018956+gh-aw-bot@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: gh-aw-bot <259018956+gh-aw-bot@users.noreply.github.com>

gh-aw-bot · 2026-09-17T15:31:23Z

@copilot PR sous-chef triage: maintainer follow-through is still blocked by one unresolved review thread.

Please address or disposition the remaining thread about the exported-but-unused RewriteExperimentsReferenceForActivationJob helper, then run the pr-finisher skill. Rewrite experiments.<name> in engine.model to valid job-scoped expressions #61599 (comment)
The branch refresh was requested for this PR run.

Generated by PR Sous Chef run: https://github.com/github/gh-aw/actions/runs/35239680233

Generated by 👨‍🍳 PR Sous Chef · pi · gpt54 · 28.8 AIC · ⊞ 9.6K · ◷
_{Comment /souschef to run again}

gh-aw-bot · 2026-09-17T15:39:59Z

@copilot Please move this PR forward.

Open review threads (newest first):

github-actions: Rewrite experiments.<name> in engine.model to valid job-scoped expressions #61599 (comment)
github-actions: Rewrite experiments.<name> in engine.model to valid job-scoped expressions #61599 (comment)
copilot-pull-request-reviewer: Rewrite experiments.<name> in engine.model to valid job-scoped expressions #61599 (comment)
copilot-pull-request-reviewer: Rewrite experiments.<name> in engine.model to valid job-scoped expressions #61599 (comment)

Please address the feedback, refresh the branch if needed, rerun any affected checks, and then continue with the pr-finisher skill.

Run: https://github.com/github/gh-aw/actions/runs/35240793612

Warning

Firewall blocked 1 domain

The following domain was blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:

github.com

To allow these domains, add them to the network.allowed list in your workflow frontmatter:

network:
  allowed:
    - defaults
    - "github.com"

See Network Configuration for more information.

Generated by 👨‍🍳 PR Sous Chef · pi · gpt54 · 24.9 AIC · ⊞ 9.3K · ◷
_{Comment /souschef to run again}

github-actions · 2026-09-19T03:47:32Z

🎉 This pull request is included in a new release.

Release: v0.89.17

Initial plan

dec1eb1

Copilot AI assigned Copilot and pelikhan Sep 17, 2026

Copilot AI linked an issue Sep 17, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request

Claude engine: ${{ experiments.model }} not rewritten — workflow fails to parse with 'Unrecognized named-value: experiments' #61584

Closed

Copilot started work on behalf of pelikhan September 17, 2026 12:56 View session

Copilot AI and others added 8 commits September 17, 2026 13:12

Rewrite experiments.<name> in engine.model to valid job-scoped expres…

3b2028d

…sions Co-authored-by: pelikhan <4175913+pelikhan@users.noreply.github.com>

Address review: avoid duplicated string logic and only rewrite declar…

fce7891

…ed experiment names Co-authored-by: pelikhan <4175913+pelikhan@users.noreply.github.com>

Optimize regex replace and add split model-field regression test

485055d

Co-authored-by: pelikhan <4175913+pelikhan@users.noreply.github.com>

Scope activation-outputs rewrite to declared experiment names

5181ea8

Co-authored-by: pelikhan <4175913+pelikhan@users.noreply.github.com>

Use word-boundary regex for activation-outputs rewrite to avoid name-…

b540207

…prefix collisions Co-authored-by: pelikhan <4175913+pelikhan@users.noreply.github.com>

Document rewriteDeclaredExperimentNames matchPrefix invariant

299fd6a

Co-authored-by: pelikhan <4175913+pelikhan@users.noreply.github.com>

Simplify redundant guard in experiments.model rewrite call site

0287598

Co-authored-by: pelikhan <4175913+pelikhan@users.noreply.github.com>

Use regex capture groups directly instead of prefix-trimming

dfb5d86

Co-authored-by: pelikhan <4175913+pelikhan@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot AI changed the title ~~[WIP] Fix Claude engine: ${{ experiments.model }} not rewritten~~ Rewrite experiments.<name> in engine.model to valid job-scoped expressions Sep 17, 2026

Copilot AI requested a review from pelikhan September 17, 2026 13:29

Copilot finished work on behalf of pelikhan September 17, 2026 13:29

pelikhan marked this pull request as ready for review September 17, 2026 13:30

Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings September 17, 2026 13:30

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of pelikhan September 17, 2026 13:30 View session

github-actions Bot reviewed Sep 17, 2026

View reviewed changes

Copilot AI reviewed Sep 17, 2026

View reviewed changes

Add ADR for experiment model reference rewrite

1e11ac8

github-actions Bot added the needs-review label Sep 17, 2026

github-actions Bot reviewed Sep 17, 2026

View reviewed changes

github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request Sep 17, 2026

[pr-sous-chef] PR Sous Chef run report #61445

Closed

github-actions Bot reviewed Sep 17, 2026

View reviewed changes

github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request Sep 17, 2026

[aw] Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer timed out #61614

Closed

Copilot started work on behalf of gh-aw-bot September 17, 2026 14:04 View session

Copilot AI and others added 2 commits September 17, 2026 14:22

Select experiments before info step and scope rewrite to expression t…

b0ba27b

…okens Co-authored-by: gh-aw-bot <259018956+gh-aw-bot@users.noreply.github.com>

Restore pinned action SHAs in release lock file

a53dc55

Co-authored-by: gh-aw-bot <259018956+gh-aw-bot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot finished work on behalf of gh-aw-bot September 17, 2026 14:27

Copilot AI requested a review from gh-aw-bot September 17, 2026 14:27

Copilot started work on behalf of gh-aw-bot September 17, 2026 15:32 View session

pelikhan merged commit 7f516a8 into main Sep 17, 2026
1 of 2 checks passed

Copilot stopped work on behalf of gh-aw-bot due to an error September 17, 2026 15:50
The session was cancelled by the user.

This was referenced Sep 20, 2026

Suggested test: copilot/experiments-model-job-scoped-rewrite githubnext/gh-aw-test#16874

Open

[blog] Weekly blog post – 2026-09-21 #62294

Merged

Conversation

Copilot AI commented Sep 17, 2026 • edited by github-actions Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Fix

Result

Tests

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Sep 17, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Sep 17, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Sep 17, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Sep 17, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Sep 17, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Comments that could not be inline-anchored

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

🟡 Changes recommended

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Sep 17, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Sep 17, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Sep 17, 2026

Evidence used

Gate result

Next action

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot Sep 17, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot Sep 17, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Sep 17, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

gh-aw-bot commented Sep 17, 2026

Uh oh!

gh-aw-bot commented Sep 17, 2026

Uh oh!

gh-aw-bot commented Sep 17, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Sep 19, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants

Copilot AI commented Sep 17, 2026 •

edited by github-actions Bot

Loading

github-actions Bot commented Sep 17, 2026 •

edited

Loading

github-actions Bot commented Sep 17, 2026 •

edited

Loading

github-actions Bot commented Sep 17, 2026 •

edited

Loading

github-actions Bot commented Sep 17, 2026 •

edited

Loading

github-actions Bot commented Sep 17, 2026 •

edited

Loading