fix(lifecycle): recover owned mux sessions#63
Conversation
|
CI coverage check: the E2E harness skips Docker scenarios when the |
|
Addressed in 96fc075: the job now creates the isolated hack-dev network before the run, and HACK_E2E_REQUIRE_DOCKER=1 makes any Docker-tier skip fail the runner. The skip gate also has a local negative-path verification. |
96fc075 to
fd66e44
Compare
|
Secret scan follow-up: the only finding was a UUID-shaped fake ownership token in a unit test. I replaced it with a constructed low-entropy test value and autosquashed the change into the original commit so the flagged literal is absent from branch history. |
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: fd66e44fe7
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 2148cf5c41
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 2148cf5c41
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Can't wait for the next one! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
Summary
Verification
Release
Release signal: yes. This is a user-visible lifecycle reliability fix and should produce a patch release through semantic-release. No separate changeset is used by this repository release flow.