docs: define Brilliant translation workflow - #23
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedToo many files! This PR contains 184 files, which is 34 over the limit of 150. To get a review, narrow the scope: ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (184)
You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughComplete restructuring of Codex translation Task 19 from a CLI-focused architecture to an app-server-integrated backend pipeline with deterministic Markdown chunking, streaming progress, atomic persistence, and Reader variant routes. Comprehensive workflow specifications, domain-split contracts, and 17 subtask guidances with validation checkpoints replace prior research-phase documentation. ChangesBrilliant Task 19 Codex Translation Workflow
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes The changes are primarily documentation of a large, multi-phase translation feature with diverse checkpoints (architecture, state machine, API, streaming, UI, error handling, tests). Complexity stems from numerous interdependent specifications, many new types/contracts, and cross-cutting concerns (auth boundaries, prompt security, persistence atomicity, recovery semantics). Homogeneous scope (all docs; no code) and absence of ambiguous logic reduce effort slightly below Possibly related PRs
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
|
feat: add Brilliant translation pipeline
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 1603af8ef0
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
review @copilot @codex Addressed all unresolved review threads and pushed signed commits through 6228a61. CI Verify and CodeRabbit are passing on the latest head. |
|
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Bravo. ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
Summary
codex exec-first plan.feat/brilliant.00-execution-contracts.mdas a lightweight contract index, then split implementation details into focusedcontracts/files for ownership, types/state/settings, SQLite, API/SSE, Markdown chunking, Codex prompt/validation, and atomic commit/purge/recovery.Goal,Files likely owned, focused contract section,Tests,Verification, andAcceptance criteria./settingsuser setting persisted in SQLite; Brilliant reads that server-side value when starting jobs and copies it into each job'slang_code.translation.job.snapshot, immutable completed-job history, and removing implementation dependency on the untracked instruction file.codex execfallback, active-job reuse response shape, cancellable turn ids, snapshot payload shape, source hash byte semantics, and route ownership aligned to existing route conventions.Validation
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation