Skip to content

Docs: prevent self-invalidating remote evidence#50

Merged
hindermath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/autonomous-retro-020
Jul 12, 2026
Merged

Docs: prevent self-invalidating remote evidence#50
hindermath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/autonomous-retro-020

Conversation

@hindermath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • record the Feature 020 retrospective and complete its 126/126 delivery evidence
  • require remote gates to be verified before merge without committing facts that invalidate their own reviewed head
  • route self-invalidating reviewed-head facts and true post-merge facts to one named causal closeout path
  • synchronize the autonomous runbook, orchestration skill, task/evidence templates, five agent surfaces, and project statistics

Field evidence

Feature PR #48 and closeout PR #49 showed that committing current check/thread facts changed the feature head, made the evidence historical immediately, and retriggered all required checks. The correction preserves pre-merge verification while removing that feedback loop from future task shaping.

Validation

  • autonomous skill schema valid
  • specify check and six-preset matrix pass
  • five autonomous agent sections match
  • 31 numeric template task IDs unique
  • Feature 020 tasks 126/126
  • git diff --check and tracked/diff secret scans pass
  • DocFX 0 warnings/0 errors
  • Playwright/axe 2/2
  • UTF-8 lynx review passes
  • no generated output tracked

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 12, 2026 02:39

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@hindermath
hindermath merged commit 26cf842 into main Jul 12, 2026
18 checks passed
@hindermath
hindermath deleted the codex/autonomous-retro-020 branch July 12, 2026 02:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants