docs: VERIFY_TOKEN is written by sandbox env too (AIT-179) - #7
Conversation
Docs-only. Now that `hookmyapp sandbox env` writes VERIFY_TOKEN, the README, AGENTS.md, and .env.example describe it as written by both `sandbox env` and `channels env`, used by the `webhook set` GET handshake, and distinct from WEBHOOK_HMAC_SECRET. No kit code changes: the GET handler already echoed VERIFY_TOKEN.
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe PR updates the environment template and documentation to state that sandbox tooling writes ChangesSandbox verification documentation
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
⚔️ Resolve merge conflicts
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)
3-8: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🔵 TrivialGate this documentation on the corresponding CLI release.
This entry promises that sandbox tooling writes
VERIFY_TOKENand performs the verification GET. Merge or publish it only after the CLI/backend AIT-179 release, or document the minimum required CLI version.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@CHANGELOG.md` around lines 3 - 8, Update the Unreleased changelog entry to specify the minimum CLI/backend AIT-179 release required for the VERIFY_TOKEN writing and verification-GET behavior, or defer the entry until that release is available.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In @.env.example:
- Around line 11-13: Update the comment above VERIFY_TOKEN to identify it as the
webhook verification/handshake token rather than a webhook URL, while preserving
the existing command references and clarifying that VERIFY_TOKEN should contain
the handshake response token.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@CHANGELOG.md`:
- Around line 3-8: Update the Unreleased changelog entry to specify the minimum
CLI/backend AIT-179 release required for the VERIFY_TOKEN writing and
verification-GET behavior, or defer the entry until that release is available.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 108c7bdf-6bab-4658-a8a4-643115a12881
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.env.exampleAGENTS.mdCHANGELOG.mdREADME.md
…ng secret (AIT-179)
Summary
.env.examplenow describeVERIFY_TOKENas written by bothhookmyapp sandbox envandhookmyapp channels env, used by thewebhook setGET handshake, and distinct fromWEBHOOK_HMAC_SECRET.VERIFY_TOKEN.Rollout
Merge after hookmyapp CLI release that writes
VERIFY_TOKEN(hookmyapp/cli AIT-179 PR).Test plan
Summary by CodeRabbit
.env.exampleto include an activeVERIFY_TOKENused for webhook verification.VERIFY_TOKENis now written by both sandbox and channel env setup flows.GETverification automatically.