ci(secret-scan): rename caller job key secret-scan -> scan (D243) - #91
Conversation
Secret-Scan-Floor (D243/D244) requires the context `scan / gitleaks` estate-wide. The caller job key here was `secret-scan`, which emits `secret-scan / gitleaks` and can never satisfy the floor. Rename only; the reusable pin and permissions are unchanged. actionlint output identical before and after. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0136eszqrQ53Kj7aBH1D4rXK
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📜 Recent review details⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (25)
|
| Layer / File(s) | Summary |
|---|---|
Rename the workflow job .github/workflows/secret-scanner.yml |
The job identifier changes from secret-scan to scan. The reusable workflow and secret inheritance remain unchanged. |
Priority: ⬇️ Low
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes
Change: Bug fix
Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to d6b9b
The scanner workflow behavior is preserved while its job name changes as intended. No actionable merge-blocking risk is established; proceed with normal checks.
Architecture Summary
Architecture risk: 🔵 Low · up to d6b9b
The changed surface does not map to a changed system, dependency edge, entrypoint, or external dependency.
Changed systems: None identified.
Architecture concerns
No architecture-level concerns identified.
Review details
Before / after behavior
- observed — Modified behavior in .github/workflows/secret-scanner.yml: The job identifier changes from
secret-scantoscan; its reusable workflow and secret inheritance remain unchanged.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
| Check name | Status | Explanation | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Description check | The description accurately explains the one-line workflow change and its purpose. However, it does not follow the repository template and omits required sections such as Type of Change, Related Issues… | Update the description to use the repository template. Mark the applicable change type, provide the related issue or state that none applies, list the change, document actionlint testing and results, complete relevant checklist items, and… |
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
| Check name | Status | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Title check | ✅ Passed | The title clearly identifies the CI change: renaming the secret-scan caller job key to scan. |
| Docstring Coverage | ✅ Passed | No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0… |
| Linked Issues check | ✅ Passed | Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. |
| Out of Scope Changes check | ✅ Passed | Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. |
Full details: Description check
Explanation
The description accurately explains the one-line workflow change and its purpose. However, it does not follow the repository template and omits required sections such as Type of Change, Related Issues, Changes Made, Testing details, Checklist items, and Breaking Changes.
Resolution
Update the description to use the repository template. Mark the applicable change type, provide the related issue or state that none applies, list the change, document actionlint testing and results, complete relevant checklist items, and state the breaking-change status.
- Fix all pre-merge checks with AI
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1
🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
- Commit to this branch
- Create a new PR
- Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts
Autopilot is currently an internal CodeRabbit preview.
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
A rabbit checks the scanner’s name,
The workflow call stays just the same.
Secrets still pass as they did before,scan takes the name secret-scan wore.
Then hops away across the floor.
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
What
Rename the secret-scanner caller job key
secret-scan→scanin.github/workflows/secret-scanner.yml, so the check context becomesscan / gitleaks— the context the estate Secret-Scan-Floor ruleset (D243/D244) requires. One-line change; reusable pin, triggers and permissions unchanged. actionlint output is identical before and after.Commit created via GraphQL
createCommitOnBranch(GitHub-signed, signature valid: true).🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_0136eszqrQ53Kj7aBH1D4rXK