Skip to content

fix(scripts): repoint checks at the .adoc files that exist - #174

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/repoint-scripts-at-adoc
Aug 26, 2026
Merged

fix(scripts): repoint checks at the .adoc files that exist#174
hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/repoint-scripts-at-adoc

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The .md.adoc documentation migration moved these files but never updated the scripts that read them, so every check naming a .md has been operating on a file that no longer exists.

Repointed: MAINTAINERS.md->MAINTAINERS.adoc

Three failure modes were in play across the estate, all fixed by the same change:

shape effect
check "X.md exists" "[ -f X.md ]" hard fail — can never pass
[ -f X.md ] && ((doc_score++)) silently scores lower
if [ -f X.md ]; then …greps… fi silent skip — the block never runs, so the gate reports success by not checking

Labels are repointed too, so failure messages name the file actually inspected. Where a script did git add … X.md, that is fixed as well — it would have failed at release time.

Only tokens whose .adoc twin exists here were rewritten; anything without a twin was left for separate triage.

Found by an estate-wide sweep of 454 repos: 56 such checks across 18 repos. Same class as hyperpolymath/Axiom.jl#82.

The .md -> .adoc documentation migration moved these files but never updated
the scripts that READ them, so every check naming a .md has been operating on
a file that no longer exists.

Repointed: MAINTAINERS.md->MAINTAINERS.adoc

Three failure modes were in play across the estate, all fixed by the same
change:
  * hard fail   - 'check "X.md exists" "[ -f X.md ]"' can never pass
  * wrong score - '[ -f X.md ] && ((doc_score++))' silently scores lower
  * SILENT SKIP - 'if [ -f X.md ]; then ...greps... fi' skips the whole block,
                  so the checks inside never run and the gate reports success
                  by not checking at all

Human-readable labels are repointed too, so failure messages name the file that
is actually inspected. Where a script did 'git add ... X.md', that is fixed as
well - it would have failed at release time.

Only tokens whose .adoc twin exists in this repository were rewritten; anything
without a twin was left untouched for separate triage.

Found by an estate-wide sweep of 454 repos: 56 such checks across 18 repos.
Same defect class as hyperpolymath/Axiom.jl#82.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: f9469676-c65c-4fc5-b4ab-52edb978b4dc

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 375d42d and f269610.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • playground/hives/me/scripts/verify-rsr.sh

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

📜 Recent review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (1)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (1)
playground/hives/me/scripts/verify-rsr.sh (1)

144-144: LGTM!

Also applies to: 226-235


📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Updated verification checks to use the current MAINTAINERS.adoc documentation format.
    • Improved validation of documentation, TPCF compliance, perimeter, and Community Sandbox requirements.

Walkthrough

The verification script now checks MAINTAINERS.adoc for documentation presence, perimeter definitions, and Community Sandbox status. The validation logic and reported outcomes remain unchanged.

Changes

Maintainers verification

Layer / File(s) Summary
MAINTAINERS.adoc verification checks
playground/hives/me/scripts/verify-rsr.sh
The documentation and TPCF checks now read MAINTAINERS.adoc instead of MAINTAINERS.md.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to f2696

The change repoints documentation checks from nonexistent .md files to the corresponding .adoc file, with no actionable merge-blocking risk remaining after normal checks and review.

Poem

A rabbit checks the document trail
MAINTAINERS.adoc guards the rail
Perimeters stand in a tidy row
Sandbox checks confirm the flow
The script hops on, steady and pale

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarises the main change: scripts now reference existing .adoc files instead of missing .md files.
Description check ✅ Passed The description directly explains the documentation migration issue, the updated references, and the resulting fixes.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 1…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 1 files.

✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@gitar-bot

gitar-bot Bot commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

You are using the Gitar free plan. Upgrade to unlock code review, CI analysis, auto-apply, custom automations, and more.

Gitar

@codacy-production

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

AI Reviewer: first review requested successfully. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

Run reviewer

TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

@codacy-production codacy-production Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR successfully repoints the verify-rsr.sh script to reference MAINTAINERS.adoc instead of the deprecated MAINTAINERS.md. Codacy reports that the changes are up to standards.

While the implementation appears correct based on the intent, there are several missing test scenarios required to ensure the script behaves correctly with the new file format and its internal structure. Specifically, validation of grep patterns against the AsciiDoc content and failure handling for missing sections in the .adoc file should be confirmed before merging.

Test suggestions

  • Execute verify-rsr.sh in a directory containing MAINTAINERS.adoc to confirm successful detection.
  • Verify grep patterns for 'Perimeter 1/2/3' and 'Community Sandbox' correctly match content within the .adoc file.
  • Ensure the script fails or warns appropriately when MAINTAINERS.adoc is present but missing required TPCF sections.
Prompt proposal for missing tests
Consider implementing these tests if applicable:
1. Execute verify-rsr.sh in a directory containing MAINTAINERS.adoc to confirm successful detection.
2. Verify grep patterns for 'Perimeter 1/2/3' and 'Community Sandbox' correctly match content within the .adoc file.
3. Ensure the script fails or warns appropriately when MAINTAINERS.adoc is present but missing required TPCF sections.

TIP Improve review quality by adding custom instructions
TIP How was this review? Give us feedback

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit e3ad626 into main Aug 26, 2026
4 checks passed
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath deleted the fix/repoint-scripts-at-adoc branch August 26, 2026 16:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant