Skip to content

proofs(coq): reconnect obliterate_not_injective after #57 closes (admit #3 of 3 from #55) #58

Description

@hyperpolymath

Background

PR #55 introduced 3 documented admits. This is the dependent one — closure is mechanical once #57 (overwrite_pass_equalizes_storage) lands.

Admit

proofs/coq/rmo_operations.v:531obliterate_not_injective

Closure path

Once overwrite_pass_equalizes_storage is sound (issue #57 above), this theorem follows by:

  1. Two storages that differ only in unmapped blocks both produce the same obliterate output.
  2. Therefore obliterate is not injective.

The proof skeleton already exists in rmo_operations.v:531-ish; just re-wire to call the (newly-sound) overwrite_pass_equalizes_storage lemma in place of the admit.

Marketing claim impact

obliterate_not_injective is the formal grounding for valence-shell's "mathematically irreversible secure deletion" marketing claim (per #42 foundation pack #5). Currently the claim rests on an Admitted. — closing this restores soundness of the README claim.

Echo-types alignment

Per #51, this is exactly EchoLossTaxonomy.const-fibre-↔-domain — could potentially be lifted directly from echo-types rather than reconstructed locally.

Blocked by

Refs

🤖 Filed from PR #55 closure

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions