docs(tutorial-22): align last two survey/weights phrasings with the 3.7.x removal#660
Conversation
Overall Assessment✅ Looks good — no unmitigated P0/P1 findings. Highest unmitigated issue is a P2 documentation anchor regression. Executive Summary
Methodology
Code Quality
Performance
Maintainability
Tech Debt
Security
Documentation/Tests
|
….7.x removal Two markdown cells (flagged by the final codex round on #659, which merged before the fix landed) still said 'permanently deferred under survey/weights' / 'QUG under survey / weights'; reworded to 'survey designs' matching the post-removal contract. Prose-only; the t22 drift-guard suite passes unchanged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
706fc69 to
a5c944f
Compare
|
🔁 AI review rerun (requested by @igerber) Head SHA: Overall Assessment✅ Looks good — no unmitigated P0/P1 findings. Executive Summary
Methodology
Code Quality
Performance
Maintainability
Tech Debt
Security
Documentation/Tests
|
Summary
survey_design=is the sole weighting entry. Prose-only — no code, no executed outputs touched; thetest_t22_had_survey_design_drift.pyguard suite passes unchanged (32), and a repo-wide loose-pattern grep (survey/weights,survey / weights) across all notebooks now returns zero.Methodology references (required if estimator / math changes)
Validation
Security / privacy
Generated with Claude Code