docs(todo): drop two resolved Actionable rows (rust vcov determinism #653; HonestDiD B2b)#662
Conversation
Overall Assessment✅ Looks good — no unmitigated P0/P1 findings. The PR is TODO bookkeeping only and does not change estimator code, math, variance/SE logic, identification assumptions, or defaults. Executive Summary
Methodology
Code Quality
Performance
Maintainability
Tech Debt
Security
Documentation/Tests
|
|
🔁 AI review rerun (requested by @igerber) Head SHA: Overall Assessment✅ Looks good — no unmitigated P0/P1 findings. This PR only removes completed TODO rows and adds a registry note for the resolved Rust clustered-vcov determinism issue. Executive Summary
Methodology
Code Quality
Performance
Maintainability
Tech Debt
Security
Documentation/Tests
|
- Rust clustered-vcov run-to-run nondeterminism: root-caused and fixed by #653 (SipHash HashMap iteration order -> first-appearance remap; 50 identical calls now bit-identical). The row deferred its own deletion until the fix merged; #653 merged 2026-07-08. - HonestDiD Delta^SD optimal-FLCI center parity: the row was already marked LANDED (SE-audit B2b, #635) with Effort 'Done' - it documented completed work, not remaining work. No code changes; CHANGELOG untouched per convention for TODO-hygiene commits (the underlying fixes carried their own entries). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…w P2) The TODO-row deletion left no file-visible resolution trail; the REGISTRY now documents the root cause (SipHash HashMap iteration order), the fix (first-appearance aggregation, #653), and the regression tests. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…m (review P3s) The wild-bootstrap chunking comment pointed at the TODO row this PR deletes; it now cites the REGISTRY determinism note + the TestClusterVcovDeterminism regression. The REGISTRY '50 identical calls' claim now distinguishes the in-fix 50-call probe from the shipped 20-repeat regression loops. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
d302033 to
1935c8d
Compare
|
🔁 AI review rerun (requested by @igerber) Head SHA: Overall Assessment✅ Looks good — no unmitigated P0/P1 findings. Executive Summary
Methodology
Code Quality
Performance
Maintainability
Tech Debt
Security
Documentation/Tests
|
Summary
Methodology references (required if estimator / math changes)
Validation
Security / privacy
Generated with Claude Code