Skip to content

release: CodeDB 0.2.5849 - #732

Merged
justrach merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
release/0.2.5847
Aug 28, 2026
Merged

release: CodeDB 0.2.5849#732
justrach merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
release/0.2.5847

Conversation

@justrach

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Ships the already production-deployed compact embedding transport from #730 and the 0.2.5849 version/changelog update from #731.

Validation:

  • feature benchmark and macOS resource regression jobs green
  • full Zig tests green
  • MCP E2E 76/76
  • live authenticated hybrid query green
  • legacy 0.2.5848 production queries remain compatible

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 2f63d18bb1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/semantic.zig
Comment on lines +643 to +644
.string => |encoded| {
if (declared_encoding == .float) return error.InvalidEmbeddingResponse;

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Require an encoding marker for compact vectors

When a response omits encoding_format but supplies a string-valued embedding, declared_encoding is null and this check allows the payload to be decoded as little-endian float16. A malformed or mismatched provider response can therefore silently produce incorrect vectors instead of failing validation; preserve legacy compatibility for unmarked JSON arrays, but accept strings only when the response explicitly declares base64-f16.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@justrach
justrach merged commit 2d1e8b8 into main Aug 28, 2026
3 checks passed
@justrach
justrach deleted the release/0.2.5847 branch August 28, 2026 15:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant