Skip to content

Show each runtime's best result in hardware charts - #47

Merged
jackwsmth merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/cascadia-hardware-chart
Sep 22, 2026
Merged

jackwsmth merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/cascadia-hardware-chart

Conversation

@jackwsmth

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

What this changes

Hardware charts currently choose one winner per model and quantization across all runtimes, so Cascadia disappears on the Arc Pro B70 page when another runtime is faster. Show the best result per model, quantization, and runtime instead, label each bar with its runtime, and remove the ten-bar cutoff so slower runtime winners remain visible.

Both the production and mock APIs use the same chart builder. The heading describes the new grouping. This changes hardware charts only; issue #44 concerns model leaderboard badge explanations and remains separate.

Checks

  • npm --prefix frontend run typecheck passes (via production build)
  • npm --prefix frontend run build passes
  • npm --prefix frontend run results:test passes (22 tests)
  • Regression coverage uses checked-in B70 submissions to verify Cascadia's 49.7 and 22.7 tok/s entries, faster competitors, ordering, and results beyond ten bars
  • UI copy describes the new grouping
  • Catalog validation: not applicable; catalog unchanged

Build reports existing Vite configuration and bundle-size warnings. Browser visual verification was not performed.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
intelinside Ready Ready Preview Sep 22, 2026 5:24pm UTC

Request Review

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
No result files to import.

Site / sign up · Workflow details and retry

@jackwsmth
jackwsmth merged commit 566bec5 into main Sep 22, 2026
5 checks passed

This branch was successfully deployed

1 active deployment
Preview — 9773ee10 Deployed Sep 22, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant