fix(lint): disable rule caching during linting - #2817
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @Maijin, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request improves the reliability of the linting process by ensuring that rule caching is explicitly disabled during linting. This prevents the use of outdated cached rule definitions, thereby eliminating a source of false positives and ensuring that linting results accurately reflect the current state of the codebase. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request disables rule caching during linting to prevent false positives from stale cache data. The implementation correctly adds a mechanism to disable caching and uses it in the lint script. I've added a couple of suggestions: one to improve code conciseness in capa/main.py and another to maintain consistency in CHANGELOG.md. Overall, this is a good and necessary fix.
|
have you encountered this being an issue @Maijin? i believe our rule caching logic checks hashes/timestamps of the rule files and should therefore cache edits. |
|
Yeah basically when I was renaming the files (via Antigravity), the linter kept using the old names and failing and It took a while to figure out that it was the cache issue. Deleting the cache files fixed it so I'm suggesting this PR to completely remove this issue. |
1109a17 to
96f76b8
Compare
mr-tz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
thanks, just two suggestions regarding the documentation
96f76b8 to
218593e
Compare
|
@mr-tz done |
Checklist