Introduce strategies for test ID generation

[Amaury Levé (Evangelink)]

Fixes #1286 and fixes AB#1634557

TODO:

• Add comments
• Add tests

[Medeni Baykal (Haplois)]

/azp run

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

[Medeni Baykal (Haplois)]

How is this going? Would you like any help Amaury Levé (@Evangelink)?

[Amaury Levé (Evangelink)]

Hey thanks for asking Medeni Baykal (@Haplois). Looks like I just need to fix CI tests (they are passing locally for me). There are still some tickets open (not fixed by this change) that I need to investigate but I feel confident we will be able to merge this one soon(TM).

[Amaury Levé (Evangelink)]

/azp run

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

[Amaury Levé (Evangelink)]

Medeni Baykal (@Haplois) please feel free to do a review when you have some free time.

[Medeni Baykal (Haplois)]

I think removing bail-out strategy might cause issues for some users, we need to rethink that, or at lease do a version increment. My approval is grey now :(

[Amaury Levé (Evangelink)]

Thanks for the review guys!

Medeni Baykal (@Haplois) What do you mean by the bail-out strategy?

[Medeni Baykal (Haplois)]

See my comment above on the code.

[Amaury Levé (Evangelink)]

Marco Rossignoli (@MarcoRossignoli) Medeni Baykal (@Haplois) I have addressed all comments, if you want to have another look. Medeni Baykal (@Haplois) There is one open question remaining for you.

[Medeni Baykal (Haplois)]

Amaury Levé (@Evangelink) uploaded a patch file for the broken ID gen. Can't push to this branch anymore.

[Amaury Levé (Evangelink)]

Medeni Baykal (@Haplois) I have applied and updated your patch. Let me know if you have any other comment or if I can move forward with merging the PR.