Skip to content

sequentialthinking's tool definition costs ~921 tokens/session; about half duplicates the schema's own parameter descriptions #4507

Description

@lCrazyblindl

The server advertises one tool whose definition costs ~921 tokens (tiktoken cl100k; ~566 of that is the description). Every session that connects the server pays this whether the tool is used or not.

Two description sections look droppable at no semantic cost: "Parameters explained" restates the description that all 9 inputSchema parameters already carry (clients send both, so the text is paid twice), and "Key features" describes the tool's virtues rather than when to call it. Keeping the intro + "When to use this tool" yields the same selection signal at ~463 tokens (50% less) — measured on the published package, method + script: https://github.com/lCrazyblindl/lap/blob/main/docs/UPSTREAM-ISSUES.md.

Happy to send the trim as a PR if the direction sounds right. (Disclosure: I maintain lap, the measurement tool used; MIT, no product.)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions