Skip to content

Should we implement a zeroth order layer in MultiOrderModel?  #172

Description

@VinsRR

The MultiOrderModel implementation is constructed with layers starting from 1. The model selection is currently implemented with some workarounds to account for the frequencies and probabilities of transitions in zeroth order.

Do we want to keep the current situation, or shall we add a zeroth order layer in the MultiOrderModel implementation?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions