Skip to content

Fix omission of to be verb #199

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
nikolasburk merged 1 commit into from
Apr 13, 2020
Merged

Fix omission of to be verb #199

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion content/03-reference/01-tools-and-interfaces/01-prisma-schema/06-relations.mdx
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ The relation fields in a 1-n relation can take the following forms:
- the annotated relation field can be either optional or required
- if the annotated relation field is required, the relation scalar must be required
- if the annotated relation field is optional, the relation scalar must be optional
- the other side of the relation must a list and is always required
- the other side of the relation must be a list and is always required

So, the following variant of the example above would be _allowed_:

Expand Down