Skip to content

blog: update meta description for Prisma Postgres vs Neon Pricing 2026 - #7991

Merged
ankur-arch merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
blog/prisma-postgres-vs-neon-pricing-2026-meta-desc-update
Jun 30, 2026
Merged

blog: update meta description for Prisma Postgres vs Neon Pricing 2026#7991
ankur-arch merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
blog/prisma-postgres-vs-neon-pricing-2026-meta-desc-update

Conversation

@prisma-gremlin

@prisma-gremlin prisma-gremlin Bot commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Updates the metaDescription frontmatter field of the blog post at prisma.io/blog/prisma-postgres-vs-neon-pricing-2026 (apps/blog/content/blog/prisma-postgres-vs-neon-pricing-2026/index.mdx).

The new meta description reflects the article's framing of the comparison — billing for different things (operations vs compute-hours) — and reads:

Is Prisma Postgres or Neon cheaper? They bill for different things: operations vs compute-hours. A side-by-side breakdown to match pricing to your usage.

This is a one-line frontmatter-only change; no body content, title, slug, or other metadata was modified.

Created by Gizmo

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the page description for the Prisma Postgres vs Neon pricing comparison to use clearer wording.
    • The new snippet now highlights an operations-vs-compute-hours comparison and references a side-by-side usage-based breakdown.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
blog Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 30, 2026 2:12pm
docs Building Building Preview, Comment Jun 30, 2026 2:12pm
eclipse Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 30, 2026 2:12pm
site Building Building Preview, Comment Jun 30, 2026 2:12pm

Request Review

@ankur-arch
ankur-arch merged commit efe5d35 into main Jun 30, 2026
13 of 16 checks passed
@ankur-arch
ankur-arch deleted the blog/prisma-postgres-vs-neon-pricing-2026-meta-desc-update branch June 30, 2026 14:13
@argos-ci

argos-ci Bot commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Argos notifications ↗︎

Build Status Details Updated (UTC)
default (Inspect) ✅ No changes detected - Jun 30, 2026, 2:21 PM

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7e9cad1a-7050-4f48-8ff6-5402e7e72e8a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dd79435 and d352c89.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/blog/content/blog/prisma-postgres-vs-neon-pricing-2026/index.mdx

Walkthrough

Updates the metaDescription field in the Prisma Postgres vs Neon pricing comparison blog post (index.mdx) with revised copy that frames the comparison around different billing dimensions (operations vs compute-hours) and mentions a side-by-side breakdown.

Blog Post Meta Copy

Layer / File(s) Summary
metaDescription copy update
apps/blog/content/blog/prisma-postgres-vs-neon-pricing-2026/index.mdx
Replaces the metaDescription string with new wording that describes how Prisma Postgres and Neon bill on different usage dimensions and that the post provides a side-by-side breakdown.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • prisma/web#7982: Introduced the same prisma-postgres-vs-neon-pricing-2026/index.mdx blog post file that this PR modifies.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant