docs: Use pak::pak() for the development install - #602
Merged
Merged
Conversation
krlmlr
force-pushed
the
claude/duplicate-repos-init-gf826x-pak
branch
from
September 13, 2026 04:31
1d6081c to
224a240
Compare
krlmlr
force-pushed
the
claude/duplicate-repos-init-gf826x-pak
branch
from
September 13, 2026 14:29
224a240 to
ba3fc66
Compare
krlmlr
force-pushed
the
claude/duplicate-repos-init-gf826x-pak
branch
from
September 13, 2026 19:53
ba3fc66 to
73c5c11
Compare
krlmlr
added this pull request to stack #611
September 13, 2026 21:05
krlmlr
force-pushed
the
claude/duplicate-repos-init-gf826x-pak
branch
from
September 13, 2026 21:06
73c5c11 to
b36ca80
Compare
One of the items `usethis::use_tidy_upkeep_issue()` prescribes for 2023.
`pak::pak()` resolves system requirements and installs binaries where they exist,
so it does not need a compiler for pure-R dependencies the way `install_github()` does.
The `# install.packages("pak")` comment is kept, matching what the packages in this fleet that already use pak do.
Both usethis and devtools import pak, so most readers already have it,
but a reader with neither of those installed still needs the line.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WWhverMTZZKgEpUuTK117m
krlmlr
force-pushed
the
claude/duplicate-repos-init-gf826x-pak
branch
from
September 14, 2026 05:27
b36ca80 to
5c9240c
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
One of the items
usethis::use_tidy_upkeep_issue()prescribes for 2023, applied across the package fleet as a single-concern change per repository.pak::pak()resolves system requirements and installs binaries where they exist, so it does not need a compiler for pure-R dependencies the wayinstall_github()does.The
# install.packages("pak")comment is kept, matching the packages in this fleet that already use pak. Both usethis and devtools import pak — usethis 3.2.2 and devtools 2.5.2 each list it inImports— so most readers already have it, but a reader with neither of those installed still needs that line.This package has no
README.Rmd, so onlyREADME.mdis touched.Part of a fleet-wide upkeep pass. The companion concern —
@rstudio.com→@posit.coauthor emails — is deliberately kept in separate pull requests.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01WWhverMTZZKgEpUuTK117m