Fix --no-default-features builds - #930
Conversation
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
Is there a reason for the |
|
The failure is not my fault. That |
|
@gnzlbg for now could similar logic be applied to only take that branch when building in libstd? |
|
@alexcrichton I've pushed a fix for that, hopefully that won't break anything else. |
|
@bors: r+ |
|
📌 Commit 78320c7 has been approved by |
|
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
|
Could a new version of libc be released that includes this change? |
|
Sure! Instructions for how to do so are here |
|
@alexcrichton it appears that the version has already been bumped since the change, but it wasn't pushed to crates.io |
|
Oops sorry about that, published now! |
It looks like this was a mistake of rust-lang#930 but should be easy to fix!
Fix a #[cfg] attribute It looks like this was a mistake of #930 but should be easy to fix!
Fix netbsd build with "stdbuild" A bug was introduced in #930 which caused netbsd to not link to libm. r? @alexcrichton
Fix netbsd build with "stdbuild" A bug was introduced in #930 which caused netbsd to not link to libm. r? @alexcrichton
Closes #928 #929 #684