Tracking issue for non-panicking pow

[milesand]

Relevant PR: #48321

[Restioson]

Can this be closed?

[milesand]

I'm sorry, it's been a while.

While this feature hasn't received much feedback by itself, but with already-stable similar functionalities present, I think this feature can be stabilized as-is.

I'm not familiar with the stabilization process though. What should I do here?

@milesand any idea when this will be stabilized? Is it going to be stabilized?

[milesand]

@alexcrichton Can we stabilize thie feature?

[alexcrichton]

@rfcbot fcp merge

Seems reasonable to me! The APIs being stabilized here (as I understand it) are:

i8::checked_pow(self, u32) -> Option<i8>
i8::saturating_pow(self, u32) -> i8
i8::wrapping_pow(self, u32) -> i8
i8::overflowing_pow(self, u32) -> (i8, bool)

(and similar for all other integral types)

[rfcbot]

Team member @alexcrichton has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged teams:

• @Kimundi
• @SimonSapin
• @alexcrichton
• @dtolnay
• @sfackler
• @withoutboats

No concerns currently listed.

Once a majority of reviewers approve (and none object), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.