Skip to content

ci: Only run compare-mode tests on one builder - #56391

Merged
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
alexcrichton:less-compare-mode
Dec 1, 2018
Merged

ci: Only run compare-mode tests on one builder#56391
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
alexcrichton:less-compare-mode

Conversation

@alexcrichton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The run-pass test suite currently takes 30 minutes on Windows, and
that appears to be roughly split between two 15 minute runs of the test
suite: one without NLL and one with NLL. In discussion on Discord the
platform coverage of the NLL compare mode may not necessarily be worth
it, so this commit removes the NLL compare mode from tests by default,
and then reenables it on only one builder.

The run-pass test suite currently takes 30 minutes on Windows, and
that appears to be roughly split between two 15 minute runs of the test
suite: one without NLL and one with NLL. In discussion on Discord the
platform coverage of the NLL compare mode may not necessarily be worth
it, so this commit removes the NLL compare mode from tests by default,
and then reenables it on only one builder.
@rust-highfive

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

r? @aturon

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 30, 2018
@alexcrichton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

@Mark-Simulacrum

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Looks solid to me. @bors r+ p=1

(Feel free to bump priority down, but I feel like this should help queue move faster)

@bors

bors commented Nov 30, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit 8ee62bb has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 30, 2018
@bors

bors commented Nov 30, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⌛ Testing commit 8ee62bb with merge 6488f958391383c5f51212f7cfeb8b247dbf9a4a...

@bors

bors commented Dec 1, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Dec 1, 2018
@alexcrichton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@bors: retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 1, 2018
@bors

bors commented Dec 1, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⌛ Testing commit 8ee62bb with merge aef4dbf...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2018
ci: Only run compare-mode tests on one builder

The run-pass test suite currently takes 30 minutes on Windows, and
that appears to be roughly split between two 15 minute runs of the test
suite: one without NLL and one with NLL. In discussion on Discord the
platform coverage of the NLL compare mode may not necessarily be worth
it, so this commit removes the NLL compare mode from tests by default,
and then reenables it on only one builder.
@bors

bors commented Dec 1, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing aef4dbf to master...

@bors
bors merged commit 8ee62bb into rust-lang:master Dec 1, 2018
@alexcrichton
alexcrichton deleted the less-compare-mode branch December 17, 2018 02:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants