Skip to content

DI-based TypeHierarchy #623

Description

@fabianbs96

Story

The current LLVMTypeHierarchy implementation relies on unrealistic assumptions about the code structure in LLVM IR and is of only little use in practice.
We need a more robust implementation that relies on debug-information.

Prerequisites

  • issue x

Out Of Scope

  • A isn't part of this

Acceptance Criteria

The following acceptance criteria are defined regarding the result of this story:
Clarify what the final result should be, not how to accomplish it.

  • DebugInfo-based TypeHierarchy implementation that works even for C++-based IR that was composed from different source-files via llvm-link
  • Criterion 2

Related Stories

  • none

Follow-up Stories

  • none

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions