docs: remove duplicate Testing section, list the semaphore sample

[steingran]

Small README cleanup following the #117 merge. The distributed semaphore functionality itself is already fully documented (use cases, quick start, service usage patterns, per-provider registration, configuration options, semaphore-vs-leader-election comparison) — this fixes two blemishes that #117's README changes introduced:

• Duplicate ## Testing section: feat: add distributed counting semaphore with multi-provider support #117 added a short Testing section right before Samples, shadowing the fuller pre-existing one that documents the Docker-based integration tests. The duplicate is removed; the complete section remains.
• Missing sample listing: feat: add distributed counting semaphore with multi-provider support #117 added samples/MultiLock.SemaphoreSample/ but didn't list it in the Samples section. It's now listed with its run command (dotnet run [provider] [maxConcurrent]).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_011D79i3saTKrBEKrhpMuDWv

---

Generated by Claude Code

[qodo-code-review]

PR Summary by Qodo

docs: remove duplicate Testing section and list semaphore sample in README

📝 Documentation 🕐 Less than 5 minutes

AI Description

• Remove the duplicate README “Testing” section introduced in #117
• Add MultiLock.SemaphoreSample to the Samples list with a run command example

High-Level Assessment

The PR’s approach is the right fix: keep the more complete existing Testing section and remove the duplicate, while ensuring the new semaphore sample is discoverable in the Samples list with a minimal run snippet.

Files changed (1) +5 / -13

Documentation (1) +5 / -13

README.mdRemove duplicate Testing section and document semaphore sample +5/-13

Remove duplicate Testing section and document semaphore sample

• Deletes the short, duplicated “## Testing” block that was shadowing the more complete testing documentation later in the README. Adds the MultiLock.SemaphoreSample to the Samples list and includes a quick run example showing the expected arguments.

README.md

[qodo-code-review]

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (1) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📜 Skill insights (0)

1. Semaphore sample args mismatch 🐞 Bug ≡ Correctness

Description

README documents running the semaphore sample as dotnet run [provider] [maxConcurrent], but the
sample supports an optional third positional argument for provider connection strings and advertises
that in its usage text. This can mislead users into thinking connection strings are not accepted or
that extra args are invalid.

Code

README.md[R809-811]

+# Run the semaphore sample: dotnet run [provider] [maxConcurrent]
+cd samples/MultiLock.SemaphoreSample
+dotnet run inmemory 3

Relevance

⭐⭐⭐ High

Team previously accepted fixing docs/examples to match actual API signature/usage (PR #10).

PR-#10

ⓘ Recommendations generated based on similar findings in past PRs

Evidence

The README addition documents only two arguments, but the semaphore sample code clearly accepts and
documents a third argument for connection strings via args[2] and prints a usage string that
includes it.

README.md[786-812]
samples/MultiLock.SemaphoreSample/Program.cs[47-77]
samples/MultiLock.SemaphoreSample/Program.cs[92-98]

Agent prompt

The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

### Issue description
The README’s semaphore sample command line usage is incomplete: it mentions only two arguments (`[provider] [maxConcurrent]`), while the sample supports a third optional argument for provider connection strings.

### Issue Context
The sample’s `Program.cs` reads `args[2]` for multiple providers (e.g., sqlserver/redis/postgresql) and prints usage including `[connection_string]`.

### Fix Focus Areas
- README.md[809-811]

### Suggested change
Update the README line to reflect the optional third argument (e.g., `dotnet run [provider] [maxConcurrent] [connectionString]`) and optionally add one example showing a provider that uses it (e.g., `redis` or `sqlserver`).

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools

---

[qodo-code-review]

1. Semaphore sample args mismatch 🐞 Bug ≡ Correctness

README documents running the semaphore sample as dotnet run [provider] [maxConcurrent], but the
sample supports an optional third positional argument for provider connection strings and advertises
that in its usage text. This can mislead users into thinking connection strings are not accepted or
that extra args are invalid.

Agent Prompt

### Issue description
The README’s semaphore sample command line usage is incomplete: it mentions only two arguments (`[provider] [maxConcurrent]`), while the sample supports a third optional argument for provider connection strings.

### Issue Context
The sample’s `Program.cs` reads `args[2]` for multiple providers (e.g., sqlserver/redis/postgresql) and prints usage including `[connection_string]`.

### Fix Focus Areas
- README.md[809-811]

### Suggested change
Update the README line to reflect the optional third argument (e.g., `dotnet run [provider] [maxConcurrent] [connectionString]`) and optionally add one example showing a provider that uses it (e.g., `redis` or `sqlserver`).

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.73%. Comparing base (2209b95) to head (a3d1a6e).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #143      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   72.61%   72.73%   +0.12%     
==========================================
  Files          65       65              
  Lines        4974     4974              
  Branches      608      608              
==========================================
+ Hits         3612     3618       +6     
+ Misses       1156     1153       -3     
+ Partials      206      203       -3     

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Harness.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2209b95...a3d1a6e. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.